H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Madison Keys vs Julia Goerges H2H: 1-0
Madison Keys holds a 1–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Madison Keys leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2014 Strasbourg quarterfinal 6-2 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2014* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Madison Keys | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | #23 | #5 | 4,999 | 2,136 | 363 | 211 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Madison Keys | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,915 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2023 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |
| 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,950 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #23 | 2,020 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |