H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Madison Keys vs Kristina Mladenovic H2H: 1-2
Kristina Mladenovic holds a 2–1 lead over Madison Keys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kristina Mladenovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2015 Beijing second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2015* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Madison Keys | 7-5 6-2 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2015* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Kristina Mladenovic | 7-5 1-6 6-2 | Madison Keys | Match data |
| May 23, 2015* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Kristina Mladenovic | (w/o) | Madison Keys | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | #23 | #5 | 4,999 | 2,136 | 363 | 211 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Madison Keys | Kristina Mladenovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,915 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,950 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2026 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #23 | 2,020 | 1 | 11 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |