H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Madison Keys vs Misaki Doi H2H: 5-1

Madison Keys holds a 5–1 lead over Misaki Doi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Madison Keys leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2022 Indian Wells Open second round 6-4 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Keys
United States Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main-draw meetings
Misaki Doi
Japan Age 35 Left-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Keys #29 6-4 3-6 6-1 Misaki Doi #95 Match data Mar 12, 2022* R64 Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Madison Keys #9 7-5 6-0 Misaki Doi #108 Match data Aug 28, 2019* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Misaki Doi #53 6-4 4-6 6-4 Madison Keys #13 Match data May 8, 2017 R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Madison Keys #7 6-2 6-0 Misaki Doi #30 Match data Oct 14, 2016* R16 Linz Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Madison Keys #32 6-0 6-4 Misaki Doi #109 Match data Oct 10, 2014* R16 Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Madison Keys #58 6-3 6-2 Misaki Doi #82 Match data May 29, 2013* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Keys #24 #5 5,004 2,134 374 217 63.3% 1 1 0 7 2 11
Misaki Doi #258 #30 1,555 1,734 99 167 37.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Misaki Doi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,725 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,743 0 1 2010 0–3 0.0% #132 1,475 0 0
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,810 0 1 2011 6–11 35.3% #120 1,492 0 0
21 2016 46–18 71.9% #8 1,943 0 2 2012 10–9 52.6% #93 1,552 0 0
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,902 0 3 2013 9–15 37.5% #90 1,569 0 0
23 2018 28–16 63.6% #17 1,907 0 3 2014 5–10 33.3% #124 1,553 0 0
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,913 0 5 2015 13–14 48.1% #54 1,657 0 1
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,869 0 5 2016 20–27 42.6% #40 1,668 0 1
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,733 0 5 2017 9–17 34.6% #122 1,530 0 1
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,865 0 6 2018 1–3 25.0% #128 1,571 0 1
28 2023 29–16 64.4% #12 1,907 0 7 2019 8–14 36.4% #82 1,644 0 1
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,945 0 8 2020 1–8 11.1% #83 1,572 0 1
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2021 11–21 34.4% #105 1,588 0 1
31 2026 31–14 68.9% #24 1,982 1 11 2022 5–13 27.8% #173 1,457 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2023 1–2 33.3% #258 1,488 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Madison Keys Misaki Doi
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 14 14 28 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2015 18 12 30 60.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2016 28 13 41 68.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 1 9 88.9% 2012 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2017 15 5 20 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2018 16 10 26 61.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2019 16 9 25 64.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 9 9 18 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2020 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 11 19 30 36.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5%
26 2021 3 9 12 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 2017 4 10 14 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2022 25 14 39 64.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2018 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2023 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2024 7 6 13 53.8% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2025 24 8 32 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 2026 14 9 23 60.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 218 142 360 60.6% 93 54 147 63.3% 63 21 84 75.0% — 68 113 181 37.6% 17 36 53 32.1% 14 18 32 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 543/591 of Madison Keys's and 241/267 of Misaki Doi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Madison Keys Misaki Doi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2009 2/2 3.0 2.0 47.5% 66.4% 55.5% 44.4% 41.7% 60.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 3/3 5.0 6.3 55.4% 67.2% 46.9% 60.5% 44.8% 58.2% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 5/5 2.0 3.4 58.1% 56.5% 44.8% 38.4% 32.9% 51.2% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 39/41 5.4 2.1 59.6% 70.0% 48.7% 65.0% 45.9% 61.4% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 45/48 4.8 1.9 60.0% 69.4% 50.0% 50.9% 48.7% 61.9% 43.5% 2010 3/3 0.0 2.0 68.2% 56.7% 42.6% 55.7% 13.9% 52.3% 34.8%
20 2015 38/50 7.3 2.2 62.2% 71.5% 51.3% 61.5% 48.1% 64.1% 41.2% 2011 15/17 1.1 3.4 62.4% 60.0% 40.7% 49.6% 40.7% 52.3% 41.7%
21 2016 49/64 5.5 1.9 64.4% 70.5% 52.7% 60.1% 52.6% 64.1% 43.8% 2012 19/19 1.7 3.0 62.4% 62.6% 48.8% 48.0% 42.8% 57.5% 45.5%
22 2017 27/27 4.5 2.9 62.7% 69.2% 49.3% 59.9% 47.8% 62.0% 43.9% 2013 20/24 1.3 3.2 59.3% 61.4% 48.6% 41.7% 39.2% 56.2% 42.1%
23 2018 42/44 5.3 1.6 64.0% 71.2% 47.8% 57.5% 45.0% 62.8% 44.2% 2014 15/15 1.7 2.7 60.4% 62.4% 40.8% 53.7% 46.0% 53.5% 41.4%
24 2019 40/40 6.9 2.5 62.0% 71.3% 47.2% 59.7% 46.2% 62.0% 43.9% 2015 18/27 2.4 2.5 62.7% 61.7% 46.2% 51.4% 59.2% 56.2% 42.3%
25 2020 13/13 4.8 0.9 67.7% 72.9% 51.8% 55.6% 48.6% 66.2% 44.1% 2016 42/47 1.9 2.2 59.9% 61.9% 47.1% 57.8% 41.6% 56.1% 39.3%
26 2021 26/26 4.6 2.4 63.7% 66.7% 43.0% 58.2% 39.9% 58.2% 41.3% 2017 24/26 1.1 1.9 62.7% 59.0% 46.8% 46.7% 40.3% 54.1% 40.0%
27 2022 48/49 4.4 3.1 63.3% 67.9% 48.2% 54.1% 44.3% 60.8% 43.7% 2018 4/4 0.8 2.3 63.7% 59.6% 42.9% 57.1% 52.2% 53.6% 42.4%
28 2023 43/45 3.9 1.9 67.5% 68.3% 48.3% 60.2% 48.0% 62.0% 44.4% 2019 22/22 0.9 3.1 59.9% 60.8% 46.1% 50.0% 54.7% 54.8% 40.3%
29 2024 36/37 3.8 2.7 69.4% 66.5% 46.5% 60.4% 46.5% 60.6% 44.9% 2020 9/9 0.7 4.1 63.4% 58.5% 41.4% 54.0% 41.3% 51.8% 39.5%
30 2025 42/52 4.4 3.8 65.8% 66.8% 46.6% 57.8% 44.0% 59.9% 45.5% 2021 29/33 0.9 2.7 61.8% 58.0% 45.0% 44.7% 51.9% 53.2% 39.3%
31 2026 45/45 4.2 3.5 64.3% 71.5% 47.4% 56.1% 48.8% 63.0% 45.1% 2022 18/18 1.2 3.6 60.4% 60.0% 39.4% 56.5% 46.6% 52.0% 37.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 3/3 2.0 1.7 68.4% 64.7% 49.6% 56.6% 34.7% 60.3% 35.7%
Career — 543/591 5.0 2.5 63.7% 69.3% 48.5% 58.1% 46.7% 61.8% 43.7% — 241/267 1.4 2.8 61.4% 60.6% 45.2% 50.8% 45.4% 54.6% 40.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Madison Keys Misaki Doi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2009 1513 104.9 -0.92 -0.60 0.987 49.0% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 1517 113.3 -3.13 -0.25 1.071 51.6% +19 — — 50.0% +0.25 0–2 0–1 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 1514 113.2 -0.48 -2.14 0.738 43.5% +13 — — 18.2% -2.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 1726 137.3 +4.59 -0.90 1.100 51.9% -46 -118 -57 58.2% +0.62 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 99.0 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 1744 136.9 +5.12 +0.02 1.142 52.3% -64 -93 +79 56.9% +0.45 6–10 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.1 -0.67 2010 1475 100.7 -0.02 -0.90 0.729 43.5% — — — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.27
20 2015 1811 145.8 +4.84 +0.40 1.147 52.7% -23 -103 +11 63.6% +1.03 7–8 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.8 +0.70 2011 1492 110.6 -2.09 -1.38 0.872 46.9% +9 — +124 35.3% -0.85 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.29
21 2016 1943 152.0 +7.53 +1.31 1.219 53.7% -32 -117 -34 65.8% +1.11 17–6 (74%) 14–10 (58%) 107.1 -0.49 2012 1552 111.2 +0.40 -0.63 1.068 51.3% -14 — +104 48.9% +0.38 5–2 (71%) 0–3 (0%) 102.4 +1.74
22 2017 1903 141.2 +3.97 +1.46 1.155 52.9% +43 -160 — 62.5% +0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 +0.26 2013 1570 117.8 -0.57 -1.00 0.962 48.8% +1 -75 — 41.8% -0.62 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.40
23 2018 1908 147.8 +5.83 +1.52 1.190 53.3% +17 -74 -12 68.1% +1.16 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 100.2 +1.54 2014 1553 112.0 -1.33 -1.10 0.890 47.5% -8 — — 35.3% -1.15 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -0.48
24 2019 1913 148.9 +4.30 +0.69 1.158 52.9% +7 -4 — 66.3% +1.05 7–7 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 99.5 +0.99 2015 1658 123.9 -1.42 +0.28 0.967 49.9% -22 -122 -54 48.4% -0.26 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 101.8 -0.92
25 2020 1869 136.6 +5.26 +1.22 1.305 54.4% +23 — — 65.4% +1.46 1–1 1–1 — +0.59 2016 1669 124.6 +0.05 -2.56 0.894 47.9% -39 -94 0 42.7% -0.70 5–8 (38%) 6–3 (67%) 101.2 -0.95
26 2021 1733 127.6 +1.29 -0.81 0.988 49.7% +11 +120 +234 43.6% -0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–5 (0%) 97.1 +1.25 2017 1531 112.4 -1.70 -2.51 0.872 47.2% -31 +75 — 32.1% -1.02 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 +0.29
27 2022 1866 154.5 +3.52 +1.76 1.116 52.1% +14 -43 — 61.1% +0.58 8–9 (47%) 11–3 (79%) 100.5 -1.43 2018 1571 111.0 -0.62 -0.93 0.914 48.6% +3 — — 36.4% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14
28 2023 1908 154.0 +4.44 +2.18 1.168 53.1% -24 -103 +181 65.3% +1.28 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 98.3 +0.85 2019 1645 124.7 -1.10 -1.27 0.892 47.9% -30 — — 40.4% -0.65 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.6 +0.04
29 2024 1945 153.9 +3.89 +2.77 1.137 52.5% -67 +54 +149 67.1% +1.18 5–3 (63%) 9–3 (75%) 105.9 +0.01 2020 1573 110.0 -2.38 -1.23 0.819 45.8% -9 +73 — 29.2% -1.38 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.58
30 2025 1964 160.3 +2.87 +2.39 1.133 52.4% +63 +39 +107 63.5% +0.80 16–6 (73%) 10–7 (59%) 107.8 -0.52 2021 1589 123.1 -2.40 -2.77 0.841 46.3% -9 -27 +70 35.3% -1.09 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 -0.58
31 2026 1982 152.9 +5.10 +2.77 1.218 53.6% -16 +38 +175 65.7% +1.21 8–8 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 93.5 +1.20 2022 1458 108.2 -3.32 -3.02 0.784 45.3% +75 -2 — 29.3% -1.46 3–2 (60%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1489 114.0 -0.38 -0.81 0.899 47.3% +67 — — 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — +0.08
Career — 2135 155.9 +4.47 +1.22 1.145 52.6% -6 -39 +96 62.4% +0.87 97–85 (53%) 92–73 (56%) 101.0 +0.62 — 1734 122.8 -1.24 -1.72 0.894 47.7% -11 -23 +50 38.9% -0.77 36–48 (43%) 23–28 (45%) 98.3 +0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.