H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Madison Keys vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 4-4

Madison Keys and Petra Kvitova are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 4–3 on hard courts, while Madison Keys leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2022 Cincinnati semifinal 6-7(6) 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Keys
USA Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Petra Kvitova
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 20, 2022* Cincinnati WTA 1000 SF Hard Petra Kvitova #28 6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 Madison Keys #24 Match data
Aug 18, 2021* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Petra Kvitova #11 7-5 6-4 Madison Keys #42 Match data
Jan 11, 2020* Brisbane WTA 500 SF Hard Madison Keys #13 3-6 6-2 6-3 Petra Kvitova #7 Match data
Oct 7, 2016 Beijing WTA 1000 QF Hard Madison Keys #9 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(5) Petra Kvitova #11 Match data
May 12, 2016* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Madison Keys #24 6-3 6-4 Petra Kvitova #9 Match data
Aug 28, 2015* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Petra Kvitova #5 4-6 6-1 6-2 Madison Keys #19 Match data
Jan 24, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Madison Keys #35 6-4 7-5 Petra Kvitova #4 Match data
Sep 27, 2013* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Hard Petra Kvitova #11 6-2 6-2 Madison Keys #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Madison Keys #23 #5 4,999 2,136 363 211 63.2% 1 1 0 6 3 11
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Petra Kvitova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,726 0 0 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,742 0 1 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,802 0 1 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1
21 2016 41–16 71.9% #8 1,915 0 2 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,892 0 3 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9
23 2018 28–15 65.1% #17 1,899 0 3 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,910 0 5 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,866 0 5 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,731 0 5 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,863 0 6 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20
28 2023 29–17 63.0% #12 1,879 0 7 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,950 0 8 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27
31 2026 25–10 71.4% #23 2,020 1 11 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29
33 — — — — — — — 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31
35 — — — — — — — 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,773 2 31