H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Madison Keys vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-3

Serena Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Madison Keys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2016 Rome final 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Keys
USA Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 15, 2016* Rome WTA 1000 F Clay Serena Williams #1 7-6(5) 6-3 Madison Keys #24 Match data
Sep 8, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-3 6-3 Madison Keys #19 Match data
Jan 30, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Serena Williams #1 7-6(5) 6-2 Madison Keys #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Madison Keys #23 #5 4,999 2,136 363 211 63.2% 1 1 0 6 3 11
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,726 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,742 0 1 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,802 0 1 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2016 41–16 71.9% #8 1,915 0 2 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,892 0 3 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2018 28–15 65.1% #17 1,899 0 3 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,910 0 5 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,866 0 5 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,731 0 5 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,863 0 6 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2023 29–17 63.0% #12 1,879 0 7 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,950 0 8 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2026 25–10 71.4% #23 2,020 1 11 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 — — — — — — — 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 — — — — — — — 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 — — — — — — — 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71