H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magda Linette vs Ajla Tomljanovic H2H: 0-3
Ajla Tomljanovic holds a 3–0 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ajla Tomljanovic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ajla Tomljanovic won the 2019 Charleston second round 6-2 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2019* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-2 7-6(7) | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2018* | Mallorca | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-3 6-4 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-2 1-6 6-2 | Magda Linette | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Ajla Tomljanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |