H2H data updated: 2026-08-10 02:15 UTC
Magda Linette vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 0-1
Andrea Petkovic holds a 1–0 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Petkovic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2016 Birmingham third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | 6-4 6-2 | Magda Linette | Match data | Jun 16, 2016* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #68 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,864 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,988 | 273 | 226 | 54.7% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Andrea Petkovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #96 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #55 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2024 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2026 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,708 | 0 | 7 |