H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Magda Linette vs Jennifer Brady H2H: 2-2
Magda Linette and Jennifer Brady are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2023 Beijing third round 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2023* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Magda Linette | 3-1 (ret.) | Jennifer Brady | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jennifer Brady | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2020* | Lexington | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jennifer Brady | 6-2 6-3 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2019 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Jennifer Brady | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Magda Linette | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Jennifer Brady | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jennifer Brady | #618 | #13 | 3,840 | 1,942 | 72 | 76 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Jennifer Brady | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #115 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,872 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |