H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Magda Linette vs Sachia Vickery.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | 6-4 3-6 6-0 | Sachia Vickery | Match data | Aug 17, 2018 | Q1 | New Haven | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #82 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 221 | 234 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sachia Vickery | #464 | #73 | 833 | 1,698 | 38 | 57 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Sachia Vickery | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #101 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #82 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Magda Linette | Sachia Vickery | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 2013 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2018 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 24 | 2016 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2019 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2020 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2021 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | 2021 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2024 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 16 | 16 | 32 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 40.7% | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 13 | 17 | 30 | 43.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 150 | 156 | 306 | 49.0% | 50 | 50 | 100 | 50.0% | 21 | 28 | 49 | 42.9% | — | 25 | 33 | 58 | 43.1% | 9 | 18 | 27 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 421/457 of Magda Linette's and 88/95 of Sachia Vickery's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Magda Linette | Sachia Vickery | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1/2 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 56.3% | 62.5% | 38.7% | 20.0% | 50.0% | 52.1% | 53.6% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6/7 | 1.3 | 4.5 | 57.4% | 57.3% | 41.5% | 53.8% | 34.6% | 50.3% | 45.0% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9/12 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 58.6% | 59.7% | 50.3% | 54.5% | 40.7% | 55.7% | 39.2% |
| 21 | 2013 | 4/6 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 72.3% | 53.8% | 53.4% | 29.2% | 46.4% | 54.1% | 42.2% | 2016 | 11/11 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 56.8% | 59.9% | 48.2% | 58.0% | 41.4% | 54.8% | 43.4% |
| 22 | 2014 | 4/6 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 57.4% | 64.6% | 42.5% | 71.4% | 31.7% | 55.7% | 43.7% | 2017 | 9/10 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 56.9% | 60.6% | 42.3% | 53.5% | 56.7% | 52.9% | 48.4% |
| 23 | 2015 | 10/20 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 63.7% | 62.2% | 50.9% | 51.9% | 48.3% | 58.0% | 40.1% | 2018 | 19/20 | 0.9 | 3.5 | 59.6% | 58.7% | 49.0% | 59.5% | 46.6% | 54.5% | 46.9% |
| 24 | 2016 | 25/26 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 62.7% | 62.0% | 44.8% | 47.4% | 37.4% | 55.3% | 39.1% | 2019 | 11/11 | 1.6 | 4.2 | 60.1% | 59.9% | 43.1% | 45.5% | 41.1% | 53.0% | 42.6% |
| 25 | 2017 | 40/40 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 67.9% | 63.5% | 46.3% | 43.8% | 40.5% | 57.7% | 41.5% | 2020 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 65.9% | 64.7% | 52.4% | 32.5% | 45.2% | 60.5% | 46.2% |
| 26 | 2018 | 30/33 | 2.3 | 3.8 | 63.5% | 62.1% | 46.1% | 50.1% | 47.8% | 55.9% | 42.4% | 2021 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 46.8% | 37.9% | 39.4% | 50.0% | 40.0% | 38.7% | 48.5% |
| 27 | 2019 | 40/42 | 4.0 | 2.9 | 57.0% | 66.2% | 48.4% | 55.6% | 51.6% | 58.7% | 43.3% | 2022 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 59.2% | 44.8% | 40.0% | 25.0% | 28.6% | 42.9% | 41.7% |
| 28 | 2020 | 22/22 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 60.8% | 65.8% | 44.0% | 49.4% | 45.6% | 57.5% | 41.2% | 2023 | 10/10 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 60.3% | 64.3% | 44.9% | 44.2% | 42.5% | 56.5% | 44.0% |
| 29 | 2021 | 31/33 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 62.0% | 68.2% | 45.1% | 51.6% | 51.1% | 59.3% | 43.5% | 2024 | 8/8 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 53.6% | 63.1% | 39.5% | 45.4% | 39.1% | 52.4% | 43.3% |
| 30 | 2022 | 45/45 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 63.9% | 65.5% | 49.5% | 52.4% | 42.2% | 59.7% | 42.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 48/49 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 67.0% | 62.0% | 48.8% | 45.6% | 46.1% | 57.4% | 41.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 52/54 | 3.3 | 1.9 | 61.7% | 65.2% | 47.9% | 58.0% | 46.4% | 58.4% | 41.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 36/44 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 59.8% | 63.1% | 45.8% | 55.3% | 42.3% | 55.8% | 39.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 34/37 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 57.6% | 63.9% | 46.1% | 43.9% | 40.4% | 56.3% | 39.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 421/457 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 62.4% | 64.2% | 47.1% | 50.6% | 44.8% | 57.6% | 41.6% | — | 88/95 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 58.3% | 60.0% | 45.5% | 51.4% | 43.5% | 53.9% | 44.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Magda Linette | Sachia Vickery | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1503 | 98.8 | -1.35 | +1.19 | 1.120 | 52.9% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | +0.36 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1491 | 100.7 | -2.15 | +0.87 | 0.905 | 47.8% | +16 | — | — | 26.7% | -1.07 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.40 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1503 | 98.8 | -2.03 | -1.64 | 0.887 | 47.7% | -17 | +31 | +124 | 39.3% | -1.21 | 3–1 (75%) | 5–0 (100%) | 107.1 | +0.37 |
| 21 | 2013 | 1536 | 102.2 | -1.11 | -2.42 | 0.920 | 48.0% | +21 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.09 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.79 | 2016 | 1521 | 102.6 | -1.47 | -1.18 | 0.962 | 49.1% | -24 | +17 | — | 46.2% | -0.19 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.7 | +0.96 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1518 | 109.9 | -1.03 | -1.10 | 0.986 | 49.6% | +15 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.14 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.11 | 2017 | 1562 | 106.0 | -1.43 | +0.91 | 1.027 | 50.6% | -33 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.24 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.15 |
| 23 | 2015 | 1576 | 118.7 | -0.76 | -1.01 | 0.955 | 49.2% | +15 | — | +23 | 50.0% | -0.26 | 3–5 (38%) | 5–2 (71%) | 101.4 | -0.29 | 2018 | 1621 | 129.2 | -0.64 | +3.43 | 1.031 | 50.8% | +41 | -118 | -7 | 51.1% | +0.09 | 1–6 (14%) | — | — | -0.78 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1583 | 116.6 | -0.13 | -2.61 | 0.875 | 48.3% | +3 | — | -35 | 36.2% | -1.00 | 5–3 (63%) | 4–3 (57%) | 104.7 | -0.02 | 2019 | 1566 | 112.8 | -2.90 | -1.45 | 0.907 | 47.4% | +18 | — | — | 36.0% | -1.24 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–0 | — | +0.70 |
| 25 | 2017 | 1728 | 126.9 | +1.02 | -1.27 | 0.983 | 49.5% | +21 | -159 | -224 | 44.6% | -0.31 | 6–9 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 101.3 | +0.07 | 2020 | 1584 | 109.3 | +1.68 | +1.36 | 1.170 | 53.4% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.40 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.06 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1601 | 117.5 | -0.12 | -0.67 | 0.960 | 49.1% | +33 | -43 | — | 46.2% | -0.27 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | 97.4 | +0.76 | 2021 | 1508 | 88.2 | +1.80 | -2.47 | 0.792 | 43.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.14 |
| 27 | 2019 | 1782 | 135.1 | +1.80 | +0.35 | 1.048 | 51.1% | +25 | -283 | -262 | 53.6% | +0.20 | 9–6 (60%) | 11–6 (65%) | 108.4 | -0.23 | 2022 | 1527 | 106.2 | -0.05 | +2.53 | 0.729 | 42.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 |
| 28 | 2020 | 1723 | 127.0 | +0.87 | -1.08 | 0.968 | 49.2% | +28 | -204 | — | 50.0% | +0.06 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.1 | +0.72 | 2023 | 1572 | 113.5 | -0.99 | +0.54 | 1.011 | 50.0% | +5 | — | — | 38.1% | -0.67 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +1.47 |
| 29 | 2021 | 1764 | 135.6 | +2.54 | +1.11 | 1.068 | 51.3% | -9 | -174 | -225 | 52.7% | 0.00 | 3–11 (21%) | 4–1 (80%) | 95.7 | -1.54 | 2024 | 1575 | 116.9 | -1.95 | -0.82 | 0.910 | 47.9% | -15 | +35 | — | 33.3% | -0.94 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | -0.21 |
| 30 | 2022 | 1719 | 132.3 | +2.26 | -0.34 | 1.061 | 50.9% | +7 | -34 | -131 | 49.5% | +0.06 | 8–7 (53%) | 10–6 (63%) | 105.0 | +0.37 | 2025 | 1547 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 1732 | 137.3 | +0.60 | -0.62 | 0.977 | 49.5% | +15 | -77 | -90 | 46.8% | -0.20 | 10–7 (59%) | 6–10 (38%) | 101.1 | -0.04 | 2026 | 1507 | 95.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 1830 | 141.2 | +1.60 | -0.83 | 1.002 | 50.2% | -97 | +38 | -210 | 52.8% | +0.07 | 9–12 (43%) | 9–6 (60%) | 100.0 | -1.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 1742 | 140.4 | -0.56 | -2.21 | 0.896 | 47.9% | -16 | +96 | -155 | 44.8% | -0.53 | 6–5 (55%) | 7–2 (78%) | 107.1 | +0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 1743 | 135.6 | -0.18 | -1.88 | 0.907 | 48.0% | -30 | +88 | -68 | 45.6% | -0.20 | 13–3 (81%) | 3–4 (43%) | 108.6 | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1863 | 136.6 | +0.89 | -0.87 | 0.980 | 49.6% | -1 | -62 | -137 | 48.0% | -0.17 | 82–79 (51%) | 70–49 (59%) | 109.8 | -0.08 | — | 1699 | 114.2 | -1.43 | +0.43 | 0.965 | 49.2% | +6 | +2 | +59 | 42.1% | -0.57 | 12–16 (43%) | 14–5 (74%) | 105.0 | +4.65 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | 6 | 2 | 8 | Sep 23, 2023 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 5 | 2 | 7 | Feb 17, 2026 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 3 | 4 | 7 | Oct 11, 2024 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 10, 2024 | H2H |
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jun 23, 2022 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle Collins | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 19, 2023 | H2H |
| Taylor Townsend | 2 | 0 | 2 | Sep 2, 2020 | H2H |
| Magdalena Rybarikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 6, 2019 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 5, 2018 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 14, 2018 | H2H |