H2H data updated: 2026-08-10 02:15 UTC
Magda Linette vs Stefanie Voegele H2H: 1-0
Magda Linette holds a 1–0 lead over Stefanie Voegele in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magda Linette leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2016 Katowice fourth round 1-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data | Apr 8, 2016* | Katowice | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #68 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,864 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,714 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Stefanie Voegele | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #96 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |