H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Magda Linette vs Xinyun Han H2H: 1-0
Magda Linette holds a 1–0 lead over Xinyun Han in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magda Linette leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2018 Taipei third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2018* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Magda Linette | 6-2 6-0 | Xinyun Han | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Magda Linette | Xinyun Han | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |