H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Magdalena Rybarikova vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 0-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 1–0 lead over Magdalena Rybarikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2009 Miami Open second round 6-3 1-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Rybarikova
Slovak Republic Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #20 6-3 1-6 6-2 Magdalena Rybarikova #47 Match data Mar 28, 2009* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magdalena Rybarikova #199 #17 2,405 1,816 188 209 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Rybarikova Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #342 1,515 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2007 0–2 0.0% #231 1,491 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2008 9–9 50.0% #59 1,567 0 0 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2009 27–26 50.9% #44 1,694 0 1 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2010 12–21 36.4% #106 1,583 0 1 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2011 14–14 50.0% #71 1,607 0 2 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2012 13–16 44.8% #62 1,604 0 3 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2013 29–22 56.9% #37 1,739 0 4 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2014 20–26 43.5% #50 1,691 0 4 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2015 16–22 42.1% #80 1,608 0 4 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2016 6–7 46.2% #154 1,656 0 4 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2017 19–11 63.3% #20 1,793 0 4 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 2018 16–22 42.1% #48 1,668 0 4 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25
30 2019 5–9 35.7% #176 1,604 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magdalena Rybarikova Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2008 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2009 17 18 35 48.6% 4 7 11 36.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2010 6 11 17 35.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2012 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2013 22 14 36 61.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2014 15 18 33 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2015 10 16 26 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2017 10 8 18 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2018 8 14 22 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
30 2019 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 123 132 255 48.2% 25 47 72 34.7% 39 28 67 58.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 363/393 of Magdalena Rybarikova's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magdalena Rybarikova Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2007 2/2 3.0 5.5 59.1% 56.0% 30.9% 60.0% 41.7% 45.3% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 13/18 3.4 3.6 60.5% 66.1% 46.3% 55.9% 60.8% 58.4% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 46/53 3.7 4.0 58.8% 64.9% 43.5% 52.9% 49.3% 56.0% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 32/33 4.3 2.7 59.0% 64.9% 43.4% 44.4% 43.2% 55.9% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 27/28 4.6 3.7 53.1% 69.6% 48.3% 57.0% 42.5% 59.5% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 25/29 3.6 2.3 53.9% 66.3% 42.2% 52.5% 55.8% 55.1% 44.3% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2013 49/51 2.9 3.1 56.7% 65.1% 42.5% 51.1% 49.4% 55.1% 44.6% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2014 45/46 3.1 2.3 58.8% 62.6% 46.3% 55.1% 42.7% 55.9% 41.1% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2015 31/38 3.4 2.6 60.4% 64.8% 48.5% 49.4% 50.0% 58.7% 40.5% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2016 12/13 4.6 3.8 54.2% 63.0% 40.9% 57.0% 47.0% 52.9% 40.3% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2017 30/30 3.8 2.1 57.2% 66.5% 44.9% 55.5% 51.5% 57.4% 44.2% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 2018 37/38 3.3 2.4 57.2% 66.1% 46.5% 52.9% 48.3% 57.6% 42.3% 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
30 2019 14/14 3.4 2.6 57.1% 63.4% 45.2% 55.4% 43.0% 55.7% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 363/397 3.6 2.9 57.5% 65.2% 44.8% 52.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.3% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magdalena Rybarikova Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 2006 1515 103.4 — — — — — +33 — 50.0% +0.30 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.12 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06
18 2007 1491 95.9 -3.33 -1.31 0.740 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.10 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59
19 2008 1568 122.6 +0.91 -0.05 1.089 51.6% -13 +17 — 55.9% +0.79 1–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.60 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67
20 2009 1694 132.9 +0.77 -0.53 0.971 49.4% -18 -136 +36 48.0% -0.26 13–8 (62%) 7–5 (58%) 107.5 -0.63 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71
21 2010 1583 120.0 +0.50 -2.50 0.926 48.2% +35 -79 +136 38.7% -0.72 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) 92.3 -1.41 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74
22 2011 1608 121.7 +2.01 -1.24 1.040 50.8% +32 -135 +113 52.5% +0.49 6–5 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 96.8 +0.48 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13
23 2012 1604 117.5 -0.46 -0.72 0.986 49.9% +27 -127 — 47.5% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 +0.36 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28
24 2013 1739 135.3 -0.28 +0.80 0.993 50.0% +32 -307 -38 55.9% +0.32 11–6 (65%) 7–7 (50%) 105.7 +0.82 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48
25 2014 1691 127.1 +0.14 -1.62 0.932 48.4% +14 -239 +3 45.4% -0.52 7–8 (47%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -1.04 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83
26 2015 1609 119.9 +0.16 -0.43 0.980 49.6% -9 -135 +81 40.5% -0.61 5–4 (56%) 3–9 (25%) 97.9 +0.28 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85
27 2016 1657 123.3 -1.07 -1.08 0.856 47.0% +10 — -5 46.2% -0.73 4–2 (67%) 1–0 — -0.81 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 2017 1794 139.4 +1.44 +1.79 1.038 51.1% -39 — +22 60.0% +0.44 5–1 (83%) 5–4 (56%) 106.1 -1.73 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52
29 2018 1668 129.9 +1.21 -0.59 0.998 49.6% -31 -170 +141 46.3% -0.15 5–7 (42%) 2–2 (50%) 98.8 +0.32 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60
30 2019 1605 113.4 -1.48 -4.35 0.794 45.6% +54 — +173 36.7% -1.17 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1816 132.8 +0.42 -0.68 0.971 49.4% +7 -121 +61 47.9% -0.18 69–54 (56%) 38–51 (43%) 100.2 -0.69 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.