H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Magdalena Rybarikova vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 0-2
Anna Tatishvili holds a 2–0 lead over Magdalena Rybarikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna Tatishvili leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Tatishvili won the 2010 Prague third round 0-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2010* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anna Tatishvili | 0-6 7-5 7-5 | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2010* | Ponte Vedra Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anna Tatishvili | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,817 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Anna Tatishvili | #1,071 | #50 | 1,210 | 1,608 | 43 | 92 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Rybarikova | Anna Tatishvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #302 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #285 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #51 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,605 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #200 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |