H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Magdalena Rybarikova vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 0-1
Iveta Benesova holds a 1–0 lead over Magdalena Rybarikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iveta Benesova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iveta Benesova won the 2009 Hobart semifinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2009* | Hobart | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Iveta Benesova | 6-1 6-3 | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,817 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Rybarikova | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,605 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |