H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magdalena Rybarikova vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 1-2

Virginie Razzano holds a 2–1 lead over Magdalena Rybarikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 2–0 on clay, while Magdalena Rybarikova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magdalena Rybarikova won the 2013 Paris third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.

SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 31, 2013* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Magdalena Rybarikova #63 6-4 3-6 6-3 Virginie Razzano #164 Match data
Apr 29, 2011* Barcelona WTA 250 R16 Clay Virginie Razzano #102 7-6(6) 1-6 6-2 Magdalena Rybarikova #72 Match data
May 6, 2009* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Virginie Razzano #35 6-0 6-7(8) 6-4 Magdalena Rybarikova #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Rybarikova #199 #17 2,405 1,817 188 207 47.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Rybarikova Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #342 1,515 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2007 0–2 0.0% #231 1,491 0 0 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2008 9–9 50.0% #59 1,568 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2009 27–26 50.9% #44 1,694 0 1 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2010 12–21 36.4% #106 1,582 0 1 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2011 14–14 50.0% #71 1,607 0 2 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2012 13–16 44.8% #62 1,605 0 3 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2013 29–22 56.9% #37 1,739 0 4 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2014 20–26 43.5% #50 1,691 0 4 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2015 16–22 42.1% #80 1,610 0 4 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2016 6–6 50.0% #154 1,665 0 4 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2017 19–11 63.3% #20 1,794 0 4 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2018 16–21 43.2% #48 1,677 0 4 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 2019 5–9 35.7% #176 1,608 0 4 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2