H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mandy Minella vs Anastasiya Yakimova H2H: 0-1
Anastasiya Yakimova holds a 1–0 lead over Mandy Minella in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasiya Yakimova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasiya Yakimova won the 2012 Wimbledon first round 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2012* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anastasiya Yakimova | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Mandy Minella | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mandy Minella | #787 | #66 | 955 | 1,644 | 58 | 102 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anastasiya Yakimova | #1,233 | #49 | 989 | 1,526 | 30 | 74 | 28.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mandy Minella | Anastasiya Yakimova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #103 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #120 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #256 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #77 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #168 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #262 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |