H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mandy Minella vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 0-1
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Mandy Minella in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2005 Hyderabad third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2005* | Hyderabad | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-3 6-4 | Mandy Minella | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mandy Minella | #787 | #66 | 955 | 1,644 | 58 | 102 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mandy Minella | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #77 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #168 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #262 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |