H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mandy Minella vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 0-1

Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Mandy Minella in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2005 Hyderabad round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mandy Minella
Luxembourg Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
GER Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #45 6-3 6-4 Mandy Minella #325 Match data Feb 10, 2005* R32 Hyderabad Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mandy Minella #787 #66 955 1,646 58 100 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #1,012 #14 1,365 1,856 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mandy Minella Anna-Lena Groenefeld
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0
19 2005 0–2 0.0% #249 1,477 0 0 2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,790 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1
22 2008 0–1 0.0% #330 1,474 0 0 2007 4–14 22.2% #204 1,527 0 1
23 2009 0–1 0.0% #243 1,465 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,597 0 1
24 2010 2–2 50.0% #136 1,504 0 0 2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1
25 2011 2–6 25.0% #110 1,472 0 0 2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1
26 2012 11–14 44.0% #77 1,515 0 0 2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1
27 2013 12–18 40.0% #106 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2014 1–5 16.7% #181 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2015 1–5 16.7% #168 1,449 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2016 8–7 53.3% #105 1,557 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 9–13 40.9% #143 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #103 1,615 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2019 3–11 21.4% #141 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #170 1,535 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2021 2–7 22.2% #262 1,537 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mandy Minella Anna-Lena Groenefeld
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 27 16 43 62.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 10 16 26 38.5% 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2013 4 9 13 30.8% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 55 82 32.9% 30 37 67 44.8% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — 58 76 134 43.3% 46 39 85 54.1% 3 11 14 21.4% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 144/156 of Mandy Minella's and 140/230 of Anna-Lena Groenefeld's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mandy Minella Anna-Lena Groenefeld
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/22 2.3 3.3 58.5% 65.7% 58.7% 42.9% 40.3% 62.7% 48.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 13/62 3.9 4.3 56.2% 70.4% 51.6% 58.5% 40.0% 62.2% 45.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 40/56 3.2 5.1 58.9% 65.4% 45.4% 57.8% 44.8% 57.3% 42.9%
22 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 56.6% 43.3% 34.8% 45.5% 100.0% 39.6% 17.2% 2007 16/18 4.6 8.0 52.4% 67.4% 39.9% 52.8% 43.4% 54.0% 38.2%
23 2009 1/1 1.0 4.0 54.3% 56.0% 45.2% 27.3% 50.0% 51.1% 46.7% 2008 13/14 5.1 5.3 47.4% 75.3% 47.4% 51.1% 46.9% 61.2% 41.4%
24 2010 4/4 0.3 3.5 61.3% 63.2% 47.1% 58.6% 26.0% 57.1% 41.4% 2009 39/41 3.6 5.4 58.2% 64.9% 46.1% 54.3% 54.9% 56.5% 41.2%
25 2011 6/8 2.2 3.2 56.2% 63.3% 39.8% 58.7% 52.7% 52.9% 38.1% 2010 14/15 2.8 7.0 55.0% 63.7% 38.6% 47.6% 48.2% 52.7% 40.9%
26 2012 24/25 1.7 3.1 60.8% 57.7% 41.7% 55.6% 49.8% 51.6% 41.9% 2011 2/2 1.5 4.0 52.6% 62.6% 38.3% 55.8% 25.0% 51.3% 27.9%
27 2013 25/30 2.3 2.3 61.6% 61.4% 45.2% 47.9% 50.5% 55.0% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 4/6 3.3 3.3 59.6% 59.0% 46.7% 53.7% 55.3% 54.5% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 4/6 1.0 1.5 75.9% 52.7% 50.0% 42.1% 44.0% 52.2% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 15/15 2.1 2.9 63.0% 62.2% 46.3% 52.9% 50.1% 56.2% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 22/22 2.9 1.7 61.2% 61.3% 43.0% 50.3% 53.3% 54.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 14/14 1.9 1.8 64.2% 60.6% 46.1% 59.5% 53.6% 55.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 14/14 1.9 2.1 66.3% 58.8% 46.3% 42.2% 40.4% 54.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1/1 14.0 2.0 56.1% 78.3% 36.1% 80.0% 0.0% 59.8% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 9/9 4.9 1.8 59.9% 55.3% 41.5% 39.1% 53.5% 49.9% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 144/158 2.3 2.4 62.1% 59.9% 44.2% 50.9% 49.6% 53.9% 41.5% — 140/239 3.6 5.6 56.1% 66.7% 45.2% 54.3% 47.1% 57.1% 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mandy Minella Anna-Lena Groenefeld
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1516 115.9 — — — — +21 +1 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.25
19 2005 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.08 2004 1478 112.5 +1.14 +0.30 1.285 54.6% +4 +58 — 34.1% -0.61 1–1 0–2 — +0.25
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1790 139.1 +3.94 +1.05 1.197 53.3% -4 -165 -292 57.8% +0.52 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.9 +1.73
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1656 132.8 +1.54 -0.91 1.005 50.2% -69 +191 -102 52.7% +0.15 10–9 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 +2.20
22 2008 1474 104.0 +0.43 -0.56 0.286 31.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.25 2007 1528 109.8 -1.58 -3.51 0.830 46.3% +7 +219 — 25.6% -1.23 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 95.2 +0.69
23 2009 1466 100.5 +0.41 -1.66 0.954 48.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.07 2008 1597 128.6 +2.89 -1.21 1.066 50.8% -17 +136 — 51.7% +0.03 0–1 — — -1.01
24 2010 1504 115.0 +0.56 +1.62 0.965 49.2% +11 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16 2009 1655 128.8 +0.58 -2.14 0.947 48.9% -56 +88 — 46.3% -0.34 5–12 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 92.8 -1.96
25 2011 1473 100.2 -1.79 -2.50 0.809 46.5% +18 — — 33.3% -1.24 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.53 2010 1563 104.5 -2.32 -1.60 0.865 46.9% 0 +100 — 37.8% -1.51 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) 97.3 -0.12
26 2012 1515 104.1 -2.82 -1.73 0.865 47.1% +13 +39 — 41.7% -0.78 7–3 (70%) 2–4 (33%) 103.3 +1.92 2011 1542 96.7 -0.53 -1.59 0.574 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.26
27 2013 1530 114.7 -0.44 -1.67 0.939 48.7% -27 +47 — 40.3% -0.65 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 104.1 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1497 105.8 -1.89 -0.14 0.938 48.7% -22 — — 23.1% -1.46 0–1 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1449 99.2 -1.50 -0.06 0.898 47.4% — +69 — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1557 110.4 -0.20 -0.12 0.990 50.0% -122 +110 — 51.6% -0.06 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1577 112.5 -1.48 -2.69 0.863 47.2% -14 +86 -35 43.1% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) 104.7 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1616 112.5 -0.68 -0.84 0.978 49.8% -45 +52 — 46.4% -0.18 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1549 114.7 -0.94 -2.06 0.869 47.0% -39 +79 — 32.4% -1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1536 101.2 -3.10 +0.34 0.804 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1537 108.6 -3.18 -1.37 0.870 46.8% -39 +69 — 29.4% -1.06 0–1 0–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1500 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1646 113.9 -1.32 -1.45 0.899 47.9% -22 +64 -35 38.8% -0.81 25–30 (45%) 16–16 (50%) 102.2 +1.20 — 1857 131.7 +0.84 -1.45 0.971 49.4% -23 +88 -197 47.2% -0.19 27–37 (42%) 17–25 (40%) 92.3 +0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.