H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mandy Minella vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 1-0

Mandy Minella holds a 1–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mandy Minella leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mandy Minella won the 2016 Bol quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mandy Minella
Luxembourg Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Marina Erakovic
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mandy Minella #186 7-5 6-4 Marina Erakovic #134 Match data Jun 4, 2016* QF Bol WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mandy Minella #787 #66 955 1,646 58 100 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Marina Erakovic #827 #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mandy Minella Marina Erakovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0
19 2005 0–2 0.0% #249 1,477 0 0 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0
22 2008 0–1 0.0% #330 1,474 0 0 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0
23 2009 0–1 0.0% #243 1,465 0 0 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0
24 2010 2–2 50.0% #136 1,504 0 0 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0
25 2011 2–6 25.0% #110 1,472 0 0 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,669 0 1
26 2012 11–14 44.0% #77 1,515 0 0 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1
27 2013 12–18 40.0% #106 1,530 0 0 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1
28 2014 1–5 16.7% #181 1,496 0 0 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1
29 2015 1–5 16.7% #168 1,449 0 0 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1
30 2016 8–7 53.3% #105 1,557 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 9–13 40.9% #143 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #103 1,615 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2019 3–11 21.4% #141 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #170 1,535 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2021 2–7 22.2% #262 1,537 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mandy Minella Marina Erakovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2010 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2013 4 9 13 30.8% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
28 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 55 82 32.9% 30 37 67 44.8% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 144/156 of Mandy Minella's and 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mandy Minella Marina Erakovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2%
22 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 56.6% 43.3% 34.8% 45.5% 100.0% 39.6% 17.2% 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6%
23 2009 1/1 1.0 4.0 54.3% 56.0% 45.2% 27.3% 50.0% 51.1% 46.7% 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5%
24 2010 4/4 0.3 3.5 61.3% 63.2% 47.1% 58.6% 26.0% 57.1% 41.4% 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6%
25 2011 6/8 2.2 3.2 56.2% 63.3% 39.8% 58.7% 52.7% 52.9% 38.1% 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4%
26 2012 24/25 1.7 3.1 60.8% 57.7% 41.7% 55.6% 49.8% 51.6% 41.9% 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9%
27 2013 25/30 2.3 2.3 61.6% 61.4% 45.2% 47.9% 50.5% 55.0% 42.2% 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0%
28 2014 4/6 3.3 3.3 59.6% 59.0% 46.7% 53.7% 55.3% 54.5% 42.7% 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0%
29 2015 4/6 1.0 1.5 75.9% 52.7% 50.0% 42.1% 44.0% 52.2% 43.0% 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1%
30 2016 15/15 2.1 2.9 63.0% 62.2% 46.3% 52.9% 50.1% 56.2% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 22/22 2.9 1.7 61.2% 61.3% 43.0% 50.3% 53.3% 54.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 14/14 1.9 1.8 64.2% 60.6% 46.1% 59.5% 53.6% 55.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 14/14 1.9 2.1 66.3% 58.8% 46.3% 42.2% 40.4% 54.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1/1 14.0 2.0 56.1% 78.3% 36.1% 80.0% 0.0% 59.8% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 9/9 4.9 1.8 59.9% 55.3% 41.5% 39.1% 53.5% 49.9% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 144/158 2.3 2.4 62.1% 59.9% 44.2% 50.9% 49.6% 53.9% 41.5% — 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mandy Minella Marina Erakovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29
19 2005 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.08 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +5 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.10
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -43 +12 +208 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1514 108.9 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -38 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07
22 2008 1474 104.0 +0.43 -0.56 0.286 31.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.25 2010 1480 102.7 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -44 — +254 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06
23 2009 1466 100.5 +0.41 -1.66 0.954 48.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.07 2011 1627 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -74 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.24
24 2010 1504 115.0 +0.56 +1.62 0.965 49.2% +11 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -33 +124 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89
25 2011 1473 100.2 -1.79 -2.50 0.809 46.5% +18 — — 33.3% -1.24 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.53 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -29 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26
26 2012 1515 104.1 -2.82 -1.73 0.865 47.1% +13 +39 — 41.7% -0.78 7–3 (70%) 2–4 (33%) 103.3 +1.92 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +39 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33
27 2013 1530 114.7 -0.44 -1.67 0.939 48.7% -27 +47 — 40.3% -0.65 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 104.1 +0.65 2015 1542 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +77 -39 +69 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36
28 2014 1497 105.8 -1.89 -0.14 0.938 48.7% -22 — — 23.1% -1.46 0–1 — — -0.11 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55
29 2015 1449 99.2 -1.50 -0.06 0.898 47.4% — +69 — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — +0.30 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44
30 2016 1557 110.4 -0.20 -0.12 0.990 50.0% -122 +110 — 51.6% -0.06 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1577 112.5 -1.48 -2.69 0.863 47.2% -14 +86 -35 43.1% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) 104.7 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1616 112.5 -0.68 -0.84 0.978 49.8% -45 +52 — 46.4% -0.18 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1549 114.7 -0.94 -2.06 0.869 47.0% -39 +79 — 32.4% -1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1536 101.2 -3.10 +0.34 0.804 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1537 108.6 -3.18 -1.37 0.870 46.8% -39 +69 — 29.4% -1.06 0–1 0–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1500 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1646 113.9 -1.32 -1.45 0.899 47.9% -22 +64 -35 38.8% -0.81 25–30 (45%) 16–16 (50%) 102.2 +1.20 — 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.