H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marcella Mesker vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-1
Marcella Mesker and Pam Casale are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on carpet, while Marcella Mesker leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1985 Princeton third round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1985* | Princeton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pam Casale | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Marcella Mesker | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1982* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Marcella Mesker | 6-2 6-4 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcella Mesker | #394 | #31 | 22 | 1,791 | 103 | 134 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcella Mesker | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1987 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #148 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #369 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |