Marcella Mesker
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 19, 1986 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 1 | 5 | 6 | Mar 6, 1986 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jun 26, 1987 | H2H |
| Joanne Russell | 3 | 2 | 5 | Oct 31, 1985 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 25, 1984 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC
Marcella Mesker and Pam Casale are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on carpet, while Marcella Mesker leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1985 Princeton round of 32 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Casale | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Marcella Mesker | Match data | Mar 7, 1985* | R32 | Princeton | WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Marcella Mesker | 6-2 6-4 | Pam Casale | Match data | Jun 16, 1982* | R64 | Eastbourne Open | WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcella Mesker | — | #31 | 22 | 1,792 | 103 | 134 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pam Casale | — | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcella Mesker | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #31 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1987 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #148 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #369 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Marcella Mesker | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 20 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% |
| 21 | 1980 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1985 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 22 | 1981 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1986 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
| 23 | 1982 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1983 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1988 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1984 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1985 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1986 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1987 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 18 | 28 | 46 | 39.1% | 28 | 35 | 63 | 44.4% | 36 | 44 | 80 | 45.0% | 20 | 25 | 45 | 44.4% | — | 66 | 49 | 115 | 57.4% | 55 | 41 | 96 | 57.3% | 15 | 19 | 34 | 44.1% | 25 | 35 | 60 | 41.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Marcella Mesker | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1598 | 118.8 | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | — | 57.4% | +0.72 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +2.08 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1811 | 140.6 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -153 | -195 | 64.1% | +1.03 | 3–6 (33%) | 6–0 (100%) | 101.9 | +2.45 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1746 | 140.5 | — | — | — | — | -55 | -5 | -107 | 50.5% | +0.01 | 1–8 (11%) | 9–5 (64%) | 95.6 | -2.94 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1771 | 144.3 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +93 | -103 | 52.1% | +0.47 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–3 (50%) | 102.6 | -1.30 |
| 20 | 1979 | 1500 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +53 | 35.5% | -1.03 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–0 | — | +0.76 | 1984 | 1915 | 155.4 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -61 | -210 | 64.8% | +1.01 | 3–6 (33%) | 7–3 (70%) | 100.3 | -3.10 |
| 21 | 1980 | 1492 | 111.8 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | +52 | 36.6% | -1.05 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–1 (75%) | 97.5 | +0.90 | 1985 | 1815 | 137.8 | — | — | — | — | +80 | -55 | -189 | 53.1% | +0.34 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | -1.03 |
| 22 | 1981 | 1559 | 120.5 | — | — | — | — | +54 | +11 | -28 | 50.0% | +0.22 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.7 | +1.12 | 1986 | 1788 | 137.2 | — | — | — | — | -55 | +53 | — | 46.8% | -0.18 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–3 (67%) | 103.8 | -3.60 |
| 23 | 1982 | 1683 | 137.3 | — | — | — | — | -141 | -24 | -8 | 51.6% | +0.34 | 5–5 (50%) | 2–7 (22%) | 99.1 | -1.00 | 1987 | 1674 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | -20 | — | -78 | 41.7% | -0.56 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.56 |
| 24 | 1983 | 1709 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | -78 | -2 | -51 | 48.1% | -0.10 | 2–5 (29%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.5 | -2.88 | 1988 | 1552 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +207 | — | 36.4% | -0.79 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–2 (33%) | 92.4 | +1.02 |
| 25 | 1984 | 1741 | 131.1 | — | — | — | — | -104 | +24 | -30 | 46.7% | -0.38 | 12–7 (63%) | 9–5 (64%) | 110.6 | +0.47 | 1989 | 1547 | 93.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.23 |
| 26 | 1985 | 1660 | 121.2 | — | — | — | — | -17 | +6 | +18 | 39.2% | -0.95 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.7 | -0.96 | 1990 | 1526 | 90.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.21 |
| 27 | 1986 | 1761 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | -42 | -66 | -55 | 58.7% | +0.24 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–1 (80%) | 104.6 | +0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1987 | 1624 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -59 | +48 | 33.3% | -1.08 | 0–4 (0%) | 2–3 (40%) | 92.6 | +0.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 1563 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | -35 | — | 27.3% | -1.27 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1792 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | -42 | -14 | +1 | 45.4% | -0.37 | 32–44 (42%) | 32–26 (55%) | 102.2 | -0.03 | — | 1945 | 143.6 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +5 | -154 | 53.9% | +0.36 | 32–43 (43%) | 38–21 (64%) | 100.1 | -2.23 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 19, 1986 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 1 | 5 | 6 | Mar 6, 1986 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jun 26, 1987 | H2H |
| Joanne Russell | 3 | 2 | 5 | Oct 31, 1985 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 25, 1984 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 3 | 7 | 10 | May 10, 1986 | H2H |
| Pilar Vasquez | 5 | 2 | 7 | Apr 6, 1988 | H2H |
| Bonnie Gadusek | 0 | 7 | 7 | Oct 13, 1985 | H2H |
| Bettina Bunge | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 19, 1987 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 3 | 3 | 6 | Nov 13, 1986 | H2H |