H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Margarita Gasparyan vs Simona Halep H2H: 0-1
Simona Halep holds a 1–0 lead over Margarita Gasparyan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simona Halep leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Simona Halep won the 2019 Madrid second round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2019 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Simona Halep | 6-0 6-4 | Margarita Gasparyan | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Simona Halep | #873 | #1 | 8,290 | 2,111 | 446 | 197 | 69.4% | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margarita Gasparyan | Simona Halep | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #47 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 49–16 | 75.4% | #2 | 1,929 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 41–14 | 74.5% | #4 | 1,997 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #1 | 1,973 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 45–12 | 78.9% | #1 | 2,005 | 1 | 18 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #4 | 1,938 | 2 | 19 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 23–3 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,056 | 2 | 22 |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 2 | 22 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #10 | 1,986 | 2 | 24 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,913 | 2 | 24 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,887 | 2 | 24 |