H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Elena Camerin vs Yung Jan Chan H2H: 0-1
Yung Jan Chan holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Elena Camerin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yung Jan Chan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yung Jan Chan won the 2009 Guangzhou fourth round 6-3 3-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2009* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Yung Jan Chan | 6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yung Jan Chan | — | — | — | 1,640 | 49 | 83 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Elena Camerin | Yung Jan Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |