H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 2-0
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez holds a 2–0 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez won the 2009 Bastad semifinal 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2009* | Bastad | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | 7-5 6-4 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2009* | Bogota | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | 6-3 6-2 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | #761 | #19 | 2,635 | 1,891 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Gisela Dulko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2010 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #35 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #162 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,678 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |