H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 0-3
Maria Kirilenko holds a 3–0 lead over Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Maria Kirilenko leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2010 Tokyo second round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2010* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2009* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Maria Kirilenko | 6-1 3-6 6-0 | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2008* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Maria Kirilenko | 6-0 6-2 | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | #761 | #19 | 2,635 | 1,891 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Maria Kirilenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2009 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2010 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #35 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #162 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,678 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |