H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Na Li H2H: 0-2
Na Li holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2011 Madrid second round 6-4 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2011* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Na Li | 6-4 7-6(6) | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2010* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Na Li | 7-6(7) 2-6 6-4 | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | #761 | #19 | 2,635 | 1,891 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,124 | 334 | 155 | 68.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Na Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2010 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #35 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #162 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,678 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #7 | 2,016 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,077 | 1 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,031 | 2 | 9 |