H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Amy Frazier H2H: 0-1
Amy Frazier holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2004 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Amy Frazier | 6-1 6-4 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Amy Frazier | #450 | #13 | 1,381 | 1,959 | 416 | 307 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Kirilenko | Amy Frazier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #58 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #33 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #19 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #39 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,835 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #39 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #61 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #26 | 1,828 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,626 | 0 | 8 |