H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Maria Kirilenko vs Anne Kremer H2H: 1-1

Maria Kirilenko and Anne Kremer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on clay, while Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2007 Budapest round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Kirilenko
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Kremer #100 6-3 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #38 Match data Apr 26, 2007* R32 Budapest Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Maria Kirilenko #33 6-1 6-2 Anne Kremer #104 Match data Mar 1, 2007* R32 Qatar Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Kirilenko — #10 3,471 1,919 287 231 55.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Anne Kremer — #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Kirilenko Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,740 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,657 0 1 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 2007 29–27 51.8% #25 1,740 0 2 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0
21 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,724 0 5 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0
22 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,721 0 5 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0
23 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,830 0 5 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0
24 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,848 0 5 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2
25 2012 33–22 60.0% #14 1,797 0 5 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,791 0 6 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2
27 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,715 0 6 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,518 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Kirilenko Anne Kremer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2002 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 23 12 35 65.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 17 17 34 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 25 18 43 58.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2009 12 15 27 44.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2010 27 16 43 62.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2012 22 13 35 62.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 2013 24 13 37 64.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 2014 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 204 152 356 57.3% 56 46 102 54.9% 23 28 51 45.1% 4 5 9 44.4% — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Kirilenko Anne Kremer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2002 1479 99.3 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2003 1522 108.4 +0.26 -0.99 1.013 51.2% +31 — — 43.5% -0.70 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 1576 122.0 -0.20 -0.34 0.970 49.9% +27 — -42 50.0% -0.11 1–3 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1741 139.7 -0.75 -3.22 0.755 44.4% +24 -184 -189 57.5% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1657 138.5 +0.48 +1.03 1.025 50.5% +25 -46 — 49.0% -0.22 3–9 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.8 +0.13 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09
20 2007 1740 141.5 +3.14 +1.28 1.100 52.1% +5 -193 -198 54.3% +0.57 7–12 (37%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 -1.01 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12
21 2008 1725 136.9 +1.27 +1.62 1.084 51.7% -38 +94 — 57.4% +0.66 14–12 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 99.4 +2.03 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53
22 2009 1721 129.6 +0.33 -0.34 0.978 49.6% -26 +33 -219 45.8% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 102.2 -1.09 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65
23 2010 1830 151.9 +3.21 +2.46 1.133 52.6% -13 -36 -270 60.2% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 103.5 +1.69 1999 1640 130.4 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35
24 2011 1849 143.8 +2.41 +3.15 1.143 52.8% -1 -89 -261 56.6% +0.67 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 +0.59 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80
25 2012 1798 144.6 +2.23 +1.06 1.066 51.4% +19 -110 -41 60.0% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 10–5 (67%) 99.8 -0.37 2001 1696 135.0 — — — — +1 -56 +60 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14
26 2013 1792 145.9 +2.97 +0.16 1.057 51.1% +15 +5 -69 63.0% +1.01 10–2 (83%) 7–3 (70%) 108.1 +0.73 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24
27 2014 1715 111.8 -3.39 -0.94 0.847 46.1% +74 +13 -13 36.7% -1.07 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 -0.37 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1519 118.4 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -39 +123 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1461 103.4 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +17 +102 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.28
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1475 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1464 94.4 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +13 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.18
Career — 1919 145.4 +1.84 +1.16 1.058 51.2% +5 -27 -136 55.0% +0.44 80–75 (52%) 50–45 (53%) 101.9 +0.33 — 1810 132.3 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +2 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.