H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Anne Kremer H2H: 1-1
Maria Kirilenko and Anne Kremer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on clay, while Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2007 Budapest third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2007* | Budapest | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Anne Kremer | 6-3 6-4 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2007* | Doha | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 6-1 6-2 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 147 | 182 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Kirilenko | Anne Kremer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |