H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Elena Baltacha H2H: 2-0
Maria Kirilenko holds a 2–0 lead over Elena Baltacha in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2013 Eastbourne fourth round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2013* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Maria Kirilenko | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Elena Baltacha | Match data |
| May 3, 2012* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Maria Kirilenko | 7-6(6) 6-1 | Elena Baltacha | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Elena Baltacha | #225 | #49 | 1,179 | 1,664 | 47 | 74 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Kirilenko | Elena Baltacha | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #51 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #174 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |