H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Jamea Jackson H2H: 1-1
Maria Kirilenko and Jamea Jackson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jamea Jackson leads 1–0 on grass, while Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2005 Beijing third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 39
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2005* | Beijing | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 7-5 7-5 | Jamea Jackson | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2005* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Jamea Jackson | 6-2 6-3 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Jamea Jackson | #382 | #43 | 479 | 1,662 | 33 | 50 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Kirilenko | Jamea Jackson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #588 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #273 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |