H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 1-2
Katarina Srebotnik holds a 2–1 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Katarina Srebotnik leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2007 US Open second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2007* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 6-4 6-3 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2007* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 6-0 7-6(5) | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
| Oct 21, 2006* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 6-3 6-2 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Kirilenko | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |