H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 0-1
Lisa Raymond holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 2004 US Open second round 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Kirilenko | Lisa Raymond | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |