H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Mariana Duque-Mariño H2H: 1-0
Maria Kirilenko holds a 1–0 lead over Mariana Duque-Mariño in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2012 London Olympics second round 6-0 1-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2012* | London Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Grass | Maria Kirilenko | 6-0 1-1 (ret.) | Mariana Duque-Mariño | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,918 | 286 | 230 | 55.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Mariana Duque-Mariño | #709 | #66 | 923 | 1,655 | 48 | 84 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Kirilenko | Mariana Duque-Mariño | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #109 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #192 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,724 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,438 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #145 | 1,486 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,848 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #78 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,791 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #110 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #107 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |