H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-3
Martina Hingis holds a 3–0 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2007 Doha fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2007* | Doha | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-2 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
| May 4, 2006* | Warsaw | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 7-5 7-6(1) | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2006* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | QF | Carpet | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-1 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Kirilenko | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |