H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maria Kirilenko vs Mary Pierce H2H: 0-1

Mary Pierce holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2004 Libéma Open round of 16 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Kirilenko
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Pierce #26 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #88 Match data Jun 18, 2004* R16 Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,918 286 230 55.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Kirilenko Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1
17 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4
18 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,740 0 1 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,657 0 1 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5
20 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7
21 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,724 0 5 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7
22 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,720 0 5 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8
23 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,829 0 5 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12
24 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,848 0 5 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2012 33–22 60.0% #14 1,797 0 5 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15
26 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,791 0 6 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15
27 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,715 0 6 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15
28 — — — — — — — 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 — — — — — — — 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16
30 — — — — — — — 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18
31 — — — — — — — 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Kirilenko Mary Pierce
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 2002 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 2004 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0%
18 2005 23 12 35 65.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
19 2006 17 17 34 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6%
20 2007 24 17 41 58.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
22 2009 12 15 27 44.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2010 27 16 43 62.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3%
24 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2012 22 13 35 62.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2013 24 13 37 64.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2014 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
Career — 203 151 354 57.3% 56 46 102 54.9% 23 28 51 45.1% 4 5 9 44.4% — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Kirilenko Mary Pierce
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34
15 2002 1479 99.3 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.52 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17
16 2003 1522 108.4 +0.26 -0.99 1.013 51.2% +31 — — 43.5% -0.70 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +0.35 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05
17 2004 1576 122.0 -0.20 -0.34 0.970 49.9% +27 — -41 50.0% -0.11 1–3 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.38 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22
18 2005 1741 139.7 -0.75 -3.22 0.755 44.4% +24 -184 -189 57.5% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -0.06 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14
19 2006 1657 138.5 +0.48 +1.03 1.025 50.5% +25 -46 — 49.0% -0.22 3–9 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.8 +0.13 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50
20 2007 1740 140.8 +3.14 +1.31 1.100 52.1% +5 -194 -199 54.4% +0.57 7–12 (37%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.64 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10
21 2008 1725 136.8 +1.27 +1.62 1.084 51.7% -38 +93 — 57.4% +0.66 14–12 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 99.4 +2.04 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43
22 2009 1720 129.5 +0.33 -0.34 0.978 49.6% -26 +33 -218 45.8% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 102.2 -1.07 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07
23 2010 1830 151.8 +3.21 +2.46 1.133 52.6% -13 -36 -271 60.2% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 103.5 +1.69 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64
24 2011 1848 143.7 +2.41 +3.15 1.143 52.8% 0 -89 -260 56.6% +0.67 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 +0.59 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22
25 2012 1798 144.6 +2.23 +1.06 1.066 51.4% +18 -110 -42 60.0% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 10–5 (67%) 99.8 -0.37 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29
26 2013 1791 145.9 +2.97 +0.16 1.057 51.1% +16 +6 -68 63.0% +1.01 10–2 (83%) 7–3 (70%) 108.1 +0.73 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21
27 2014 1715 111.8 -3.39 -0.94 0.847 46.1% +74 +12 -13 36.7% -1.07 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 -0.37 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83
Career — 1919 145.3 +1.84 +1.16 1.058 51.2% +5 -27 -136 55.0% +0.44 80–75 (52%) 50–45 (53%) 101.9 +0.41 — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.