H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Maria Kirilenko vs Mary Pierce H2H: 0-1
Mary Pierce holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2004 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2004 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Mary Pierce | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Kirilenko | Mary Pierce | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 |
| 23 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 |
| 24 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 |
| 25 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 |
| 26 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 |
| 27 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 |