H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maria Kirilenko vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 1-1

Maria Kirilenko and Nathalie Dechy are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on grass, while Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2007 Birmingham round of 32 5-7 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Kirilenko
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Kirilenko #44 5-7 6-2 6-0 Nathalie Dechy #46 Match data Jun 14, 2007* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Nathalie Dechy #35 6-4 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #22 Match data Aug 17, 2006* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,918 286 230 55.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,918 293 272 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Kirilenko Nathalie Dechy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,500 0 0
18 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,740 0 1 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,540 0 0
19 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,657 0 1 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,606 0 0
20 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,788 0 0
21 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,724 0 5 2000 30–20 60.0% #26 1,792 0 0
22 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,720 0 5 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,629 0 0
23 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,829 0 5 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0
24 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,848 0 5 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,840 0 1
25 2012 33–22 60.0% #14 1,797 0 5 2004 33–24 57.9% #21 1,809 0 1
26 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,791 0 6 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,797 0 1
27 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,715 0 6 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,648 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Kirilenko Nathalie Dechy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2002 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2004 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2005 23 12 35 65.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 2006 17 17 34 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 2007 24 17 41 58.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 12 11 23 52.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
22 2009 12 15 27 44.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2010 27 16 43 62.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 13 7 20 65.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2012 22 13 35 62.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2013 24 13 37 64.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2014 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 8 15 23 34.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 10 18 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
Career — 203 151 354 57.3% 56 46 102 54.9% 23 28 51 45.1% 4 5 9 44.4% — 160 145 305 52.5% 71 66 137 51.8% 34 33 67 50.7% 28 28 56 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 385/513 of Maria Kirilenko's and 132/292 of Nathalie Dechy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maria Kirilenko Nathalie Dechy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2003 3/10 0.7 4.7 67.0% 62.0% 54.6% 48.5% 58.2% 59.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 3/17 1.7 6.7 58.3% 62.1% 49.2% 53.1% 46.4% 56.7% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 9/50 1.6 2.7 59.7% 57.9% 43.6% 52.4% 52.3% 52.4% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 34/48 2.3 4.6 60.9% 63.7% 45.3% 51.9% 41.2% 56.5% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 47/54 2.5 3.5 65.8% 64.6% 48.1% 52.4% 46.7% 58.8% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 45/56 1.8 3.0 67.5% 61.8% 47.0% 51.0% 49.8% 57.0% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 42/45 1.8 3.2 63.3% 61.6% 45.0% 49.9% 46.5% 55.6% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 56/60 1.6 2.7 65.1% 64.4% 48.9% 51.5% 46.6% 59.0% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 47/52 1.7 3.0 69.1% 62.7% 49.8% 48.9% 51.8% 58.6% 47.3% 2003 7/49 1.7 4.9 64.0% 63.0% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 58.4% 50.8%
25 2012 41/55 2.6 3.2 65.0% 65.3% 44.9% 52.7% 49.7% 58.2% 44.6% 2004 8/57 1.9 3.4 68.4% 60.9% 50.1% 65.8% 62.3% 56.9% 44.5%
26 2013 46/52 3.3 3.7 59.5% 64.8% 49.8% 56.9% 44.3% 58.9% 43.5% 2005 18/66 1.4 3.2 69.7% 61.9% 48.5% 60.7% 55.8% 57.5% 44.6%
27 2014 12/14 2.2 3.6 64.6% 59.2% 36.4% 48.8% 39.3% 50.9% 41.6% 2006 31/41 1.6 2.8 72.6% 60.3% 44.3% 54.0% 44.4% 55.9% 42.0%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 27/35 1.1 3.0 72.8% 56.7% 43.7% 46.8% 46.2% 53.3% 42.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 26/29 1.7 4.7 64.9% 59.5% 41.5% 48.8% 54.7% 53.0% 43.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 15/15 1.3 3.5 68.6% 58.7% 41.0% 48.6% 48.4% 53.2% 39.3%
Career — 385/516 2.2 3.4 64.5% 63.3% 47.2% 51.8% 47.2% 57.6% 44.9% — 132/565 1.5 3.5 69.6% 59.6% 44.5% 52.1% 49.9% 54.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Kirilenko Nathalie Dechy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2002 1479 99.3 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2003 1522 108.4 +0.26 -0.99 1.013 51.2% +31 — — 43.5% -0.70 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +0.35 1995 1481 98.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
17 2004 1576 122.0 -0.20 -0.34 0.970 49.9% +27 — -41 50.0% -0.11 1–3 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.38 1996 1501 112.9 — — — — +19 +53 — 38.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.56
18 2005 1741 139.7 -0.75 -3.22 0.755 44.4% +24 -184 -189 57.5% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -0.06 1997 1540 124.8 — — — — -7 +9 — 42.9% -0.29 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — -0.35
19 2006 1657 138.5 +0.48 +1.03 1.025 50.5% +25 -46 — 49.0% -0.22 3–9 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.8 +0.13 1998 1607 125.9 — — — — -40 -52 +18 42.2% -0.42 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 +0.60
20 2007 1740 140.8 +3.14 +1.31 1.100 52.1% +5 -194 -199 54.4% +0.57 7–12 (37%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.64 1999 1788 147.7 — — — — -63 -117 -80 55.1% +0.41 11–6 (65%) 6–4 (60%) 108.9 -1.15
21 2008 1725 136.8 +1.27 +1.62 1.084 51.7% -38 +93 — 57.4% +0.66 14–12 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 99.4 +2.04 2000 1792 145.6 — — — — -2 -103 -48 58.7% +0.61 9–6 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 101.9 -1.62
22 2009 1720 129.5 +0.33 -0.34 0.978 49.6% -26 +33 -218 45.8% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 102.2 -1.07 2001 1629 124.7 — — — — +13 +69 +76 48.6% -0.06 7–12 (37%) 5–5 (50%) 93.7 -0.20
23 2010 1830 151.8 +3.21 +2.46 1.133 52.6% -13 -36 -271 60.2% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 103.5 +1.69 2002 1770 144.3 — — — — -37 +23 -68 56.2% +0.35 14–11 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 105.9 -0.89
24 2011 1848 143.7 +2.41 +3.15 1.143 52.8% 0 -89 -260 56.6% +0.67 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 +0.59 2003 1840 138.9 +1.35 +3.00 1.221 54.2% -60 +48 -96 58.5% +0.48 12–2 (86%) 2–3 (40%) 108.2 -0.85
25 2012 1798 144.6 +2.23 +1.06 1.066 51.4% +18 -110 -42 60.0% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 10–5 (67%) 99.8 -0.37 2004 1810 147.7 +1.35 +0.63 1.034 51.1% +6 +3 -86 57.9% +0.62 7–9 (44%) 6–8 (43%) 95.0 -1.40
26 2013 1791 145.9 +2.97 +0.16 1.057 51.1% +16 +6 -68 63.0% +1.01 10–2 (83%) 7–3 (70%) 108.1 +0.73 2005 1798 146.1 +1.56 +0.35 1.048 51.3% +22 -36 -11 56.8% +0.55 12–6 (67%) 9–10 (47%) 98.9 +1.39
27 2014 1715 111.8 -3.39 -0.94 0.847 46.1% +74 +12 -13 36.7% -1.07 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 -0.37 2006 1648 128.2 +0.04 -1.40 0.952 49.0% -1 +72 +148 42.7% -0.42 7–9 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 92.6 +0.62
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1651 130.6 -1.46 -0.89 0.907 47.9% -3 +66 +97 45.6% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–8 (33%) 95.8 -1.91
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1671 130.8 -1.57 -0.33 0.919 48.2% +12 -28 +59 45.5% -0.24 4–4 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 -1.85
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1581 108.4 -1.61 -3.48 0.839 46.8% +48 +1 +106 32.4% -1.11 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 96.4 -0.41
Career — 1919 145.3 +1.84 +1.16 1.058 51.2% +5 -27 -136 55.0% +0.44 80–75 (52%) 50–45 (53%) 101.9 +0.41 — 1919 143.2 -0.42 -0.73 0.953 49.1% -9 0 -6 51.4% +0.13 98–90 (52%) 60–67 (47%) 96.4 -1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.