H2H data updated: 2026-11-07 00:00 UTC

Maria Kirilenko vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-3 (incl. walkovers)

Maria Kirilenko vs Tamira Paszek: 1–2 excluding walkovers; 1–3 including 1 walkover. Across 4 main-draw results including walkovers, Tamira Paszek leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2011 China Open round of 16 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Kirilenko
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H including walkovers
1 – 3
4 main-draw results
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Kirilenko #24 6-1 6-2 Tamira Paszek Match data Oct 7, 2011* R16 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Tamira Paszek (w/o) Maria Kirilenko #26 Match data Aug 4, 2011* R32 San Diego Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Tamira Paszek 6-3 3-6 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #23 Match data Aug 27, 2008* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tamira Paszek 6-1 6-3 Maria Kirilenko #25 Match data Jan 5, 2008* QF ASB Classic Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Kirilenko — #10 3,471 1,919 287 231 55.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Tamira Paszek — #366 169 1,783 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Kirilenko Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,740 0 1 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,657 0 1 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2007 29–27 51.8% #25 1,740 0 2 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,724 0 5 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,721 0 5 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,830 0 5 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,848 0 5 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2012 33–22 60.0% #14 1,797 0 5 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,791 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,715 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Kirilenko Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2002 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 2004 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2005 23 12 35 65.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2006 17 17 34 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2007 25 18 43 58.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2009 12 15 27 44.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2010 27 16 43 62.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2012 22 13 35 62.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2013 24 13 37 64.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 204 152 356 57.3% 56 46 102 54.9% 23 28 51 45.1% 4 5 9 44.4% — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 385/515 of Maria Kirilenko's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maria Kirilenko Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 2003 3/10 0.7 4.7 67.0% 62.0% 54.6% 48.5% 58.2% 59.5% 41.0% 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 2004 3/17 1.7 6.7 58.3% 62.1% 49.2% 53.1% 46.4% 56.7% 42.0% 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 2005 9/50 1.6 2.7 59.7% 57.9% 43.6% 52.4% 52.3% 52.4% 35.9% 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2006 34/48 2.3 4.6 60.9% 63.7% 45.3% 51.9% 41.2% 56.5% 44.6% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2007 47/56 2.5 3.5 65.8% 64.6% 48.1% 52.4% 46.7% 58.8% 45.3% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2008 45/56 1.8 3.0 67.5% 61.8% 47.0% 51.0% 49.8% 57.0% 46.5% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2009 42/45 1.8 3.2 63.3% 61.6% 45.0% 49.9% 46.5% 55.6% 43.5% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2010 56/60 1.6 2.7 65.1% 64.4% 48.9% 51.5% 46.6% 59.0% 46.4% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2011 47/52 1.7 3.0 69.1% 62.7% 49.8% 48.9% 51.8% 58.6% 47.3% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2012 41/55 2.6 3.2 65.0% 65.3% 44.9% 52.7% 49.7% 58.2% 44.6% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2013 46/52 3.3 3.7 59.5% 64.8% 49.8% 56.9% 44.3% 58.9% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 12/14 2.2 3.6 64.6% 59.2% 36.4% 48.8% 39.3% 50.9% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 385/518 2.2 3.4 64.5% 63.3% 47.2% 51.8% 47.2% 57.6% 44.9% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.3% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Kirilenko Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 2002 1479 99.3 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.52 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 2003 1522 108.4 +0.26 -0.99 1.013 51.2% +31 — — 43.5% -0.70 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +0.35 2007 1730 133.2 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -49 -178 +8 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.40
17 2004 1576 122.0 -0.20 -0.34 0.970 49.9% +27 — -42 50.0% -0.11 1–3 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.38 2008 1697 128.9 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.56
18 2005 1741 139.7 -0.75 -3.22 0.755 44.4% +24 -184 -189 57.5% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -0.06 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +25 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.03
19 2006 1657 138.5 +0.48 +1.03 1.025 50.5% +25 -46 — 49.0% -0.22 3–9 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.8 +0.13 2010 1643 119.0 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2007 1740 141.5 +3.14 +1.28 1.100 52.1% +5 -193 -198 54.3% +0.57 7–12 (37%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 -1.01 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +85 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2008 1725 136.9 +1.27 +1.62 1.084 51.7% -38 +94 — 57.4% +0.66 14–12 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 99.4 +2.03 2012 1677 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -92 -243 +188 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2009 1721 129.6 +0.33 -0.34 0.978 49.6% -26 +33 -219 45.8% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 102.2 -1.09 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2010 1830 151.9 +3.21 +2.46 1.133 52.6% -13 -36 -270 60.2% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 103.5 +1.69 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2011 1849 143.8 +2.41 +3.15 1.143 52.8% -1 -89 -261 56.6% +0.67 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 +0.59 2015 1443 101.3 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +33 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2012 1798 144.6 +2.23 +1.06 1.066 51.4% +19 -110 -41 60.0% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 10–5 (67%) 99.8 -0.37 2016 1531 113.8 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 34.4% -1.12 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2013 1792 145.9 +2.97 +0.16 1.057 51.1% +15 +5 -69 63.0% +1.01 10–2 (83%) 7–3 (70%) 108.1 +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 1715 111.8 -3.39 -0.94 0.847 46.1% +74 +13 -13 36.7% -1.07 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1511 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1919 145.4 +1.84 +1.16 1.058 51.2% +5 -27 -136 55.0% +0.44 80–75 (52%) 50–45 (53%) 101.9 +0.33 — 1783 124.8 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -17 -177 +137 43.9% -0.51 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.