H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Maria Sakkari vs Ashleigh Barty H2H: 1-3
Ashleigh Barty holds a 3–1 lead over Maria Sakkari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ashleigh Barty leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2019 US Open third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GRE
Age 30
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 7-5 6-3 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2019* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 5-7 6-2 6-0 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 7-5 6-1 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2018* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Maria Sakkari | 6-4 6-2 | Ashleigh Barty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sakkari | #37 | #3 | 5,085 | 2,033 | 258 | 205 | 55.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,199 | 191 | 70 | 73.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Sakkari | Ashleigh Barty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #98 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2019 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,070 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #22 | 1,881 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,082 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2021 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 43–7 | 86.0% | #1 | 2,142 | 2 | 13 |
| 26 | 2022 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,917 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 15 |
| 27 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #32 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #37 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |