H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Maria Sharapova vs Fabiola Zuluaga H2H: 1-0
Maria Sharapova holds a 1–0 lead over Fabiola Zuluaga in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Sharapova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2005 Indian Wells fourth round 4-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2005* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Fabiola Zuluaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,856 | 113 | 97 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Sharapova | Fabiola Zuluaga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 | 2000 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 | 2004 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,683 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |