H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Maria Sharapova vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 6-1

Maria Sharapova holds a 6–1 lead over Lindsay Davenport in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2008 Amelia Island semifinal W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Sharapova
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 12, 2008* Amelia Island WTA 500 SF Clay Maria Sharapova #5 (w/o) Lindsay Davenport #30 Match data
Jan 17, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Maria Sharapova #5 6-1 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #51 Match data
Feb 25, 2006* Dubai WTA 500 SF Hard Maria Sharapova #4 3-6 6-1 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #3 Match data
Nov 7, 2005 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Maria Sharapova #3 6-3 5-7 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #1 Match data
Mar 14, 2005* Indian Wells WTA 1000 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-0 6-0 Maria Sharapova #3 Match data
Feb 7, 2005* Tokyo WTA 1000 F Carpet Maria Sharapova #3 6-1 3-6 7-6(5) Lindsay Davenport #1 Match data
Jul 4, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Maria Sharapova #15 2-6 7-6(5) 6-1 Lindsay Davenport #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Maria Sharapova #373 #1 10,690 2,238 596 174 77.4% 5 14 1 9 7 36
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Sharapova Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 1–2 33.3% #188 1,503 0 0 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 2003 24–12 66.7% #32 1,779 0 2 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 2004 55–16 77.5% #4 2,063 1 7 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2005 53–13 80.3% #4 2,068 1 10 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2006 59–10 85.5% #2 2,210 2 15 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2007 40–12 76.9% #5 2,113 2 16 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2008 31–6 83.8% #9 2,098 3 19 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2009 31–9 77.5% #14 2,050 3 20 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2010 33–11 75.0% #18 1,981 3 22 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2011 43–13 76.8% #4 1,993 3 24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2012 55–10 84.6% #2 2,155 4 27 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2013 37–8 82.2% #4 2,136 4 29 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2014 50–13 79.4% #2 2,093 5 33 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2015 35–10 77.8% #4 2,044 5 35 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2016 4–1 80.0% #91 2,049 5 35 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2017 16–7 69.6% #61 1,976 5 36 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2018 21–11 65.6% #29 1,929 5 36 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2019 8–8 50.0% #133 1,858 5 36 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54
33 2020 0–2 0.0% #373 1,820 5 36 — — — — — — —