H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Sharapova vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 2-0
Maria Sharapova holds a 2–0 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2006 Indian Wells third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2006* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-4 6-0 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2006* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Maria Sharapova | 6-4 6-4 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Sharapova | Lisa Raymond | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |