H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Maria Sharapova vs Martina Hingis H2H: 2-1
Maria Sharapova holds a 2–1 lead over Martina Hingis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2006 Indian Wells semifinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2006* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-3 6-3 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2006* | Dubai | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-3 6-4 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2006* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | SF | Carpet | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-1 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Sharapova | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |
| 27 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |