H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Sharapova vs Mary Pierce H2H: 3-1
Maria Sharapova holds a 3–1 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2006 San Diego quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2006* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-2 6-3 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| May 13, 2005* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2005* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-4 6-3 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Sep 5, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Mary Pierce | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Sharapova | Mary Pierce | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 |
| 23 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 |
| 24 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 |
| 25 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 |
| 26 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 |
| 27 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 |
| 28 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 |
| 29 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 |
| 30 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 |
| 31 | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 |
| 32 | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |