H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Maria Sharapova vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 2-1
Maria Sharapova holds a 2–1 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2017 Rome third round 6-4 3-6 1-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2017* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 6-4 3-6 1-2 (ret.) | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| May 8, 2017 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 4-6 6-4 6-0 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
| May 24, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 6-3 6-0 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Sharapova | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |