H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maria Sharapova vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 2-1

Maria Sharapova holds a 2–1 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2017 Italian Open second round 6-4 3-6 1-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Sharapova
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #22 6-4 3-6 1-2 (ret.) Maria Sharapova #211 Match data May 18, 2017* R32 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Maria Sharapova #258 4-6 6-4 6-0 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #21 Match data May 8, 2017 R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Maria Sharapova #8 6-3 6-0 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #94 Match data May 24, 2011* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Sharapova #373 #1 10,690 2,264 601 175 77.4% 5 14 1 7 9 36
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Sharapova Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 1–2 33.3% #188 1,503 0 0 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1
16 2003 24–12 66.7% #32 1,778 0 2 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2
17 2004 55–16 77.5% #4 2,074 1 7 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2
18 2005 53–13 80.3% #4 2,099 1 10 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2
19 2006 59–10 85.5% #2 2,239 2 15 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2
20 2007 40–12 76.9% #5 2,146 2 16 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2
21 2008 31–6 83.8% #9 2,158 3 19 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2
22 2009 31–9 77.5% #14 2,076 3 20 — — — — — — —
23 2010 33–11 75.0% #18 1,991 3 22 — — — — — — —
24 2011 43–13 76.8% #4 1,994 3 24 — — — — — — —
25 2012 60–11 84.5% #2 2,167 4 27 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2
26 2013 37–8 82.2% #4 2,170 4 29 — — — — — — —
27 2014 50–13 79.4% #2 2,102 5 33 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2
28 2015 35–10 77.8% #4 2,066 5 35 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2
29 2016 4–1 80.0% #91 2,074 5 35 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2
30 2017 16–7 69.6% #61 2,007 5 36 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2
31 2018 21–11 65.6% #29 1,923 5 36 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2
32 2019 8–8 50.0% #133 1,877 5 36 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3
33 2020 0–2 0.0% #373 1,837 5 36 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,633 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Sharapova Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 2003 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 0 4 100.0% 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2004 34 12 46 73.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 0 12 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
18 2005 29 8 37 78.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2006 45 5 50 90.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 2007 24 7 31 77.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 17 2 19 89.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 20 5 25 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 19 7 26 73.1% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 25 10 35 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 32 7 39 82.1% 19 1 20 95.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 19 4 23 82.6% 17 3 20 85.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 26 10 36 72.2% 19 1 20 95.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 18 6 24 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2016 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 2017 11 4 15 73.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2018 10 6 16 62.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2019 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 354 112 466 76.0% 148 35 183 80.9% 81 21 102 79.4% 18 7 25 72.0% — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 590/773 of Maria Sharapova's and 130/155 of Mirjana Lucic-Baroni's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maria Sharapova Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2003 7/36 3.4 3.4 60.1% 67.5% 51.4% 76.6% 46.5% 60.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 16/71 4.6 4.6 61.6% 71.8% 51.7% 55.0% 50.1% 64.2% 49.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 31/66 3.6 3.0 63.9% 68.3% 51.1% 63.2% 45.2% 61.9% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 65/69 4.2 3.5 65.7% 70.2% 49.3% 58.9% 54.6% 63.1% 49.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 47/52 3.7 5.9 64.2% 68.9% 43.8% 58.5% 55.5% 59.9% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 30/37 3.6 5.7 65.5% 71.3% 48.2% 63.1% 51.1% 63.3% 50.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 37/40 3.6 7.7 64.4% 65.2% 42.0% 48.7% 52.0% 56.9% 49.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 41/44 4.0 5.6 63.1% 73.2% 46.4% 53.5% 50.3% 63.1% 47.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 50/56 2.4 6.3 66.7% 66.1% 41.9% 50.2% 58.7% 58.0% 50.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 58/71 3.2 4.8 66.3% 68.4% 48.4% 62.4% 51.3% 61.8% 49.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 40/45 4.1 4.6 62.8% 73.6% 49.3% 59.7% 53.1% 64.8% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 56/63 3.3 5.8 61.4% 68.9% 47.1% 51.5% 55.2% 60.5% 50.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 37/45 4.1 5.3 62.2% 72.8% 54.6% 61.7% 46.1% 65.8% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 5/5 11.0 4.8 56.2% 77.4% 45.6% 42.7% 38.3% 63.3% 51.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 22/23 5.6 5.5 57.6% 71.2% 46.3% 58.5% 49.4% 60.8% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 31/32 4.6 6.3 59.4% 66.9% 44.2% 50.3% 49.0% 57.7% 47.0% 2013 9/19 4.1 4.1 56.7% 68.4% 48.1% 53.6% 49.9% 59.4% 41.5%
32 2019 15/16 3.2 5.5 63.8% 64.3% 43.2% 53.1% 40.4% 56.9% 44.9% 2014 20/20 4.3 5.3 53.7% 68.8% 48.0% 62.8% 45.7% 59.1% 44.5%
33 2020 2/2 6.0 8.0 57.4% 70.1% 45.0% 33.3% 41.7% 59.5% 32.6% 2015 29/43 3.6 6.9 56.7% 63.3% 46.8% 46.1% 48.6% 56.4% 38.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 31/32 2.5 6.3 55.5% 65.0% 41.4% 44.4% 54.4% 54.7% 47.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 36/36 3.2 6.6 57.5% 64.6% 41.2% 51.9% 58.5% 54.6% 43.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 5/5 1.4 5.2 54.9% 60.4% 37.5% 48.1% 68.9% 50.9% 37.9%
Career — 590/776 3.8 5.3 63.6% 69.5% 47.2% 56.7% 51.7% 61.3% 48.6% — 130/302 3.3 6.2 56.1% 65.1% 43.9% 50.4% 53.2% 55.9% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Sharapova Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2002 1504 110.4 — — — — +30 — — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–1 — -0.19 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12
16 2003 1779 134.3 +2.16 +0.59 1.123 52.8% -35 — -9 62.2% +1.01 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) 103.1 +1.00 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +120 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.58
17 2004 2075 160.2 +5.99 +3.49 1.370 56.2% -57 -383 +32 70.6% +1.66 15–6 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 106.7 -0.75 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.60
18 2005 2099 166.8 +5.53 +3.06 1.233 54.4% +3 -259 +90 73.5% +1.92 17–4 (81%) 7–4 (64%) 110.0 -1.58 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28
19 2006 2239 171.2 +7.19 +5.40 1.327 55.9% +47 -395 -48 83.2% +2.22 6–3 (67%) 9–1 (90%) 106.5 -0.72 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02
20 2007 2147 162.6 +4.20 +4.33 1.195 53.9% +73 -223 +47 73.2% +1.66 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 101.7 -1.40 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
21 2008 2158 159.5 +6.81 +5.50 1.362 56.2% +107 -167 — 77.8% +2.09 10–3 (77%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -0.56 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09
22 2009 2076 148.9 +1.97 +5.02 1.140 52.9% +130 -100 -34 66.3% +1.14 14–3 (82%) 3–4 (43%) 100.7 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 1992 156.3 +6.24 +4.11 1.299 55.3% +92 -12 +88 69.6% +1.69 9–5 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 96.6 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 1994 155.2 +2.58 +6.97 1.200 54.1% -10 +64 +124 70.2% +1.52 12–1 (92%) 8–2 (80%) 108.8 +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 2167 168.4 +6.37 +7.20 1.305 55.7% -46 +49 -37 75.8% +1.95 14–1 (93%) 8–6 (57%) 109.9 -3.27 2007 1537 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.13
26 2013 2171 165.9 +8.74 +6.16 1.409 56.7% -28 +101 — 80.0% +2.14 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 -1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 2102 166.1 +4.81 +7.11 1.270 55.2% -43 +205 -9 69.7% +1.51 20–8 (71%) 7–8 (47%) 97.7 -1.90 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18
28 2015 2066 159.8 +6.34 +5.11 1.365 55.9% -11 +167 +15 74.5% +2.02 8–2 (80%) 0–6 (0%) 96.3 -1.45 2010 1554 111.8 — — — — -70 — +160 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.12
29 2016 2074 132.1 +2.31 +3.11 1.391 56.6% -2 — — 72.7% +2.18 1–0 0–1 — -0.38 2011 1551 110.1 — — — — -82 +119 +144 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83
30 2017 2008 140.4 +3.36 +2.15 1.173 53.4% +44 +217 — 68.6% +1.41 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -0.43 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +122 +176 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36
31 2018 1923 146.3 +1.41 +3.43 1.111 52.2% +35 +236 — 63.0% +0.96 5–6 (45%) 3–3 (50%) 92.0 +0.14 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31
32 2019 1877 145.3 +0.28 +1.89 1.042 50.8% +56 — +135 59.3% +0.59 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 -1.54 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -115 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45
33 2020 1838 108.1 +0.15 +0.49 0.806 46.2% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.11 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1625 127.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -46 +79 -10 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +7 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03
Career — 2265 167.5 +5.03 +5.13 1.257 54.8% +13 +7 +28 72.0% +1.67 161–60 (73%) 74–61 (55%) 104.4 -1.78 — 1799 132.5 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.