H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Maria Sharapova vs Na Li H2H: 10-5
Maria Sharapova holds a 10–5 lead over Na Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 5–2 on hard courts and 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2014 Madrid quarterfinal 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
10
–
5
15 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2014* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | Na Li | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2013* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 6-4 6-3 | Na Li | Match data |
| Jan 27, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Na Li | 6-2 6-2 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2012* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-4 6-0 | Na Li | Match data |
| May 20, 2012* | Rome | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 4-6 6-4 7-6(5) | Na Li | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2012* | Miami | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-3 6-0 | Na Li | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2011 | WTA Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Na Li | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Na Li | 6-4 7-5 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2010* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Na Li | 7-5 6-1 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2009* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Na Li | 6-4 6-4 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 6-4 0-6 6-4 | Na Li | Match data |
| Sep 5, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-4 6-2 | Na Li | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2006* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Maria Sharapova | 6-2 6-4 | Na Li | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2006* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-2 6-4 | Na Li | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-0 6-2 | Na Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,124 | 334 | 155 | 68.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Sharapova | Na Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 | 2008 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 |
| 30 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 | 2012 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #7 | 2,016 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,077 | 1 | 7 |
| 32 | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,031 | 2 | 9 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |