H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Sharapova vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 1-1
Maria Sharapova and Silvia Farina Elia are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on clay, while Maria Sharapova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2005 Australian Open fourth round 4-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
| May 14, 2004* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 7-6(3) 6-0 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Sharapova | Silvia Farina Elia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |