H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Maria Sharapova vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0
Maria Sharapova holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Sharapova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2007 Birmingham fourth round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Jun 15, 2007* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,264 | 601 | 175 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Sharapova | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 7 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,099 | 1 | 10 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,239 | 2 | 15 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,146 | 2 | 16 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,158 | 3 | 19 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,076 | 3 | 20 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,991 | 3 | 22 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,994 | 3 | 24 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2012 | 60–11 | 84.5% | #2 | 2,167 | 4 | 27 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,170 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,102 | 5 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,064 | 5 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,071 | 5 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 2,006 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,923 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,873 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,833 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |