H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Sharapova vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 2-0
Maria Sharapova holds a 2–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2004 Beijing fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2004* | Beijing | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-1 6-1 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2004* | Memphis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 2-1 (ret.) | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Sharapova | Tatiana Panova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |