H2H data updated: 2026-11-09 00:00 UTC

Marie Bouzkova vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 0-2

Kaia Kanepi holds a 2–0 lead over Marie Bouzkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kaia Kanepi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2022 Australian Open second round 6-2 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marie Bouzkova
Czech Republic Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Kaia Kanepi
Estonia Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kaia Kanepi #115 6-2 7-6(3) Marie Bouzkova #86 Match data Jan 20, 2022* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Kaia Kanepi #106 4-6 6-4 6-2 Marie Bouzkova #46 Match data Sep 29, 2020* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Marie Bouzkova #57 7-5 6-3 Kaia Kanepi #101 Match data Jan 4, 2020 Q1 Q Brisbane International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marie Bouzkova #23 #21 2,019 1,938 171 142 54.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Kaia Kanepi — #15 2,760 1,908 264 236 52.8% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marie Bouzkova Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2015 0–1 0.0% #391 1,484 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2017 0–2 0.0% #175 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2018 1–3 25.0% #139 1,479 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #229 1,484 0 0
20 2019 9–10 47.4% #57 1,633 0 0 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,527 0 0
21 2020 9–10 47.4% #52 1,716 0 0 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2021 15–20 42.9% #90 1,619 0 0 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,581 0 0
23 2022 29–15 65.9% #24 1,895 0 1 2008 30–21 58.8% #27 1,761 0 0
24 2023 22–21 51.2% #34 1,829 0 1 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,603 0 0
25 2024 25–22 53.2% #44 1,768 0 1 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,842 0 1
26 2025 27–17 61.4% #42 1,836 0 2 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,799 0 1
27 2026 34–21 61.8% #23 1,889 0 4 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,862 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,838 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,719 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,659 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,663 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,732 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2018 12–12 50.0% #61 1,777 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 9–9 50.0% #101 1,762 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,729 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,699 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,802 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2023 6–15 28.6% #168 1,627 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marie Bouzkova Kaia Kanepi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2018 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2019 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2020 8 8 16 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2006 8 8 16 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2021 12 13 25 48.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2022 22 10 32 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 19 12 31 61.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2023 16 14 30 53.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2024 17 17 34 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
26 2025 18 11 29 62.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2026 16 15 31 51.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2012 13 6 19 68.4% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 12 12 24 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 10 8 18 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 118 100 218 54.1% 31 26 57 54.4% 22 16 38 57.9% — — — — — 156 134 290 53.8% 88 76 164 53.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 295/315 of Marie Bouzkova's and 427/488 of Kaia Kanepi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marie Bouzkova Kaia Kanepi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2015 1/1 1.0 2.0 73.3% 40.9% 43.8% 22.2% 44.4% 41.7% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2017 2/2 0.0 3.0 56.2% 48.4% 33.6% 55.8% 25.0% 41.9% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2018 4/4 1.5 2.0 62.8% 60.5% 49.0% 41.5% 40.5% 56.3% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2019 19/19 1.4 1.7 61.6% 61.2% 50.4% 55.6% 54.2% 56.6% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2020 19/19 2.2 2.3 67.0% 63.3% 48.3% 58.7% 45.6% 58.2% 43.0% 2006 5/30 3.2 3.6 50.1% 63.5% 51.7% 55.9% 43.1% 57.7% 43.7%
22 2021 35/36 1.7 2.8 67.8% 60.6% 49.3% 54.6% 48.3% 56.7% 41.8% 2007 21/30 3.0 7.0 57.0% 65.6% 38.7% 49.4% 52.0% 54.0% 42.6%
23 2022 42/44 1.8 2.1 66.5% 66.7% 52.4% 56.7% 46.0% 61.9% 46.7% 2008 37/51 2.4 5.1 58.3% 64.6% 45.9% 53.8% 50.1% 56.9% 45.8%
24 2023 42/43 1.9 2.2 68.2% 62.9% 47.3% 56.1% 47.6% 58.1% 44.7% 2009 35/36 3.1 5.3 52.3% 64.9% 42.8% 47.9% 52.3% 54.2% 43.8%
25 2024 46/47 2.4 2.8 62.8% 64.7% 46.2% 52.8% 49.9% 57.7% 45.2% 2010 42/46 3.7 5.1 59.4% 68.5% 44.9% 53.1% 44.3% 59.0% 47.2%
26 2025 31/45 1.8 3.6 62.2% 64.6% 46.2% 59.6% 58.6% 57.6% 47.3% 2011 35/36 4.4 4.3 57.1% 67.9% 44.3% 58.6% 44.1% 57.8% 44.4%
27 2026 54/55 1.6 3.1 68.3% 65.7% 45.8% 55.2% 48.7% 59.6% 46.3% 2012 34/34 4.0 4.7 57.0% 70.7% 48.0% 55.5% 51.0% 61.0% 47.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 30/31 4.1 4.5 55.7% 69.5% 47.3% 59.5% 45.7% 59.5% 43.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 36/36 4.1 5.5 55.7% 65.5% 43.2% 50.9% 45.3% 55.4% 43.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 18/20 3.5 4.7 55.8% 66.6% 45.7% 55.4% 59.7% 57.3% 41.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 65.3% 65.6% 11.8% 16.7% 100.0% 46.9% 38.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 71.5% 61.5% 44.5% 61.3% 43.3% 56.5% 42.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 22/24 2.6 4.5 59.6% 64.2% 47.7% 53.3% 45.4% 57.7% 44.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 18/18 3.5 4.7 58.4% 66.1% 42.5% 47.5% 39.9% 56.0% 44.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 3.6 3.2 58.7% 62.0% 47.8% 41.4% 49.8% 56.5% 45.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 22/23 3.7 4.6 51.7% 65.7% 46.8% 49.5% 54.1% 56.4% 41.5%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 39/40 4.6 3.7 55.9% 68.5% 49.0% 49.4% 45.1% 59.7% 43.1%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 21/21 2.5 3.1 57.0% 66.2% 46.9% 46.5% 42.8% 57.7% 40.7%
Career — 295/315 1.8 2.7 65.8% 63.9% 47.9% 55.5% 49.2% 58.4% 45.0% — 427/500 3.6 4.7 56.7% 66.8% 45.4% 52.4% 47.7% 57.5% 44.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marie Bouzkova Kaia Kanepi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2015 1485 98.1 -2.24 -1.64 0.773 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.10 2001 1497 105.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.28
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1498 103.4 — — — — — +23 — 40.0% -0.90 — — — +0.03
18 2017 1494 106.1 -1.49 -0.07 0.627 39.0% — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2018 1479 110.0 -1.67 -0.73 0.977 49.7% +18 — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 — — +0.04 2004 1485 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19
20 2019 1633 122.1 +0.35 +0.86 1.010 49.8% 0 — — 43.6% -0.21 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.34 2005 1527 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 54.5% +0.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
21 2020 1717 141.5 +0.80 +1.18 1.028 50.7% +16 -221 — 52.3% +0.16 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — -1.01 2006 1607 113.9 +0.07 -1.13 1.033 50.5% +4 -62 — 47.9% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +0.19
22 2021 1620 133.5 -0.35 -1.30 0.964 49.3% +31 -161 +40 46.2% +0.09 6–8 (43%) 2–8 (20%) 92.5 -0.46 2007 1582 120.1 -1.50 -0.76 0.926 48.4% +15 +20 -16 46.5% -0.18 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 +0.14
23 2022 1896 144.9 +3.79 +3.69 1.225 54.1% -7 -302 -141 65.9% +1.21 7–6 (54%) 7–3 (70%) 105.3 +0.64 2008 1762 142.2 +1.74 +1.87 1.063 51.4% -3 -51 — 55.6% +0.40 13–9 (59%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.02
24 2023 1829 141.6 +1.49 +1.83 1.068 51.5% -3 -225 -78 51.6% +0.42 6–7 (46%) 5–10 (33%) 96.6 -0.10 2009 1604 134.3 -0.69 +1.03 0.958 49.2% +69 +58 — 45.0% -0.20 4–8 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 89.0 +0.80
25 2024 1768 141.0 +0.77 +1.67 1.069 51.3% -3 -44 -35 53.3% +0.32 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 101.1 +0.32 2010 1843 146.9 +2.60 +3.18 1.151 53.0% -59 -101 -166 63.4% +0.93 3–8 (27%) 9–3 (75%) 101.4 -0.99
26 2025 1837 145.9 +0.99 +3.60 1.117 52.6% -14 -42 -143 62.0% +0.83 6–8 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 98.6 -0.07 2011 1799 142.9 +1.95 +1.23 1.051 51.0% +49 -115 -218 50.6% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 3–6 (33%) 97.9 +0.49
27 2026 1889 151.0 +2.34 +2.92 1.146 52.7% -39 -29 +49 58.0% +0.61 5–5 (50%) 8–8 (50%) 101.8 +1.86 2012 1862 140.4 +3.77 +2.86 1.226 54.3% -34 -10 — 67.5% +1.30 7–2 (78%) 3–2 (60%) 104.5 +0.29
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1839 132.4 +2.40 +0.55 1.085 51.8% -38 +74 -165 62.9% +0.74 6–2 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 +0.19
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1720 134.8 +0.25 +0.12 0.969 49.5% +37 +80 -56 48.9% -0.16 7–9 (44%) 9–4 (69%) 97.8 -0.89
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1660 126.5 -0.20 +0.50 0.961 49.3% +50 +99 — 47.5% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.35
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1664 112.6 +1.02 -0.64 0.730 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1732 125.5 -0.85 +0.35 0.969 49.3% +34 — — 57.1% -0.14 2–0 — — +0.38
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1777 140.4 +1.23 +0.94 1.059 51.2% +67 -33 -156 54.7% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 93.5 -0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1762 130.8 -0.84 +2.11 1.014 50.2% +14 +33 — 48.9% 0.00 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 102.0 -0.46
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1729 113.7 +0.66 +1.49 1.042 51.0% +2 — — 41.7% +0.17 1–1 0–2 — -0.22
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1700 135.8 +0.07 -0.08 0.950 49.1% +53 +14 — 44.0% -0.34 4–2 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.7 -1.55
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1802 144.9 +2.41 +0.90 1.071 51.2% +48 +6 -236 54.7% +0.25 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -0.84
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1627 124.3 +1.07 -1.99 0.962 49.0% +69 +54 — 38.0% -0.72 1–7 (13%) 2–8 (20%) 87.2 -0.08
Career — 1939 145.9 +1.40 +1.92 1.082 51.6% -4 -113 -33 54.7% +0.46 41–51 (45%) 33–42 (44%) 95.7 +0.52 — 1909 143.0 +1.22 +1.05 1.039 50.8% +23 +4 -154 52.4% +0.17 85–88 (49%) 63–63 (50%) 96.4 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.