H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Marie Bouzkova vs Zarina Diyas
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marie Bouzkova vs Zarina Diyas.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 27
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marie Bouzkova | #21 | #21 | 2,019 | 1,915 | 164 | 135 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marie Bouzkova | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #52 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2023 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,826 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #44 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2025 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #42 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2026 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #21 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |