H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Marina Erakovic vs Aleksandra Wozniak H2H: 0-1
Aleksandra Wozniak holds a 1–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aleksandra Wozniak leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Aleksandra Wozniak won the 2012 London Olympics second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 38
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2012* | London Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Grass | Aleksandra Wozniak | 6-2 6-1 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,695 | 105 | 133 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Aleksandra Wozniak | #1,042 | #21 | 2,114 | 1,792 | 103 | 128 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marina Erakovic | Aleksandra Wozniak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #492 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #66 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #125 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #107 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #66 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #130 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #106 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,549 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |