H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Marina Erakovic vs Alla Kudryavtseva H2H: 2-0
Marina Erakovic holds a 2–0 lead over Alla Kudryavtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marina Erakovic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marina Erakovic won the 2017 Quebec City third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 38
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2017* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marina Erakovic | 6-4 6-1 | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2008* | Memphis | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Marina Erakovic | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,701 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Alla Kudryavtseva | #841 | #56 | 1,056 | 1,670 | 85 | 138 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marina Erakovic | Alla Kudryavtseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #66 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #212 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #170 | 1,506 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #98 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #106 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #142 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |